Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc TZWLF

Where have all the cheerleaders gone?

[degans]

Sherbet, you'll appreciate this:

Where have all the cheerleadersgone,
Long  time passing,
Where have all the cheerleaders gone
Longtime ago
Where have all the cheerleaders gone
Gone to bankruptcy,everyone,
When will they ever learn, oh when will they ever learn?

Forthe hundredth time people, there are only TWO realities, the chart, andthe financials.  FORGET THE STORY.
FORGET THE DREAM.   This couldstill be profitable but you lambs need to pay attention.  Forget thebafflegab,  forget the "should, could, and perhaps".  Forget the 60 daysof this, and interested Aperto stakeholders bla bla bla.    Consideryour losses here as the tuition to the School of Trading.   You needsteely discipline to be successful.   Buy and hold only works for BlueChip stocks.  This is NOT a blue chip stock.  There is too much risk inbuying and holding any penny stock.  The double top on the chart told usall this was going down.  It appears we have found support at .90  withresistance around 1.10.   Do not average down and don't go long untilwe move up through resistance.  Read my lips, FORGET the backlog oforders.  It's the story.  Forget the explanations.  Focus ONLY on thechart and the Financials because they are the ONLY thing we know forsure.   Everything else is conjecture.  Repeat after me: 1. chart 2.Financials.  Keep saying it to yourself when the cheerleaders andbafflegabbers return, and you know they will all too soon when the priceeventually recovers.  The chart and ONLY the chart should determineyour entrance and exit points.  No more goofiness here, please.  Focus.

[sherbet2]

Hello Degans et al, Yes; one had appreciated your recent provisioning of information, Degans.Well stated, Degans.You are correct; the “market’s makers” and stock price “shakers” do not (IMO) tend to buy the prevailing story outright; i.e. such savvy institutional investment account managers and retail kinds of “investors” do tend to concentrate on the financials and the correlations occurring

[degans]

Sherbet.   Respectfully, my interest in your analysis of the loans and the tier one financing bla bla  is lower than a snake's a$$ in a wagon rut.    All you are doing is perpetuating the story and perhaps you have self interest in doing so.    In fact, I suspect most people here could care less on the details.   In reality, everything you are pontificating

[sherbet2]

Hello Degans et al, You stated, “Respectfully, my interest in your analysis of the loans and the tier one financing bla bla  is lower than a snake's a$$ in a wagon rut.” Response:  Now that would be a very low interest level indeed, eh. LOL Which story exactly would one be “perpetuating”, Degans? Additionally, one does not presently own any amount of Tranzeo

[StockAddict1]

HiWould that not be 400,000$ in hard cold cash or approximately 248,448 shares valued at approximately 1.62 ?Have a great long weekendProsper !

[403xyz1]

And I would be very surprised if the choice was not Tanzeo's as whether they deliver cash or the shares valued at $1.62! Stand by to....©Wait and Win™

[menoalittle]

>> Additionally, one does not presently own any amount >> of TranzeoWireless TechnologiesInc shares Ah... but given your current intense interest in Tranzeo, along with what might seem to be at times to border on what some might consider "privileged" information... Perhaps YOU are one of the aforementioned Aperto stakeholders due to be issued either a portion of cash, or

[sherbet2]

Hello Menoalittle et al,  Yes, MenoalittleOne does have a flirting interest in keeping informed of precisely what is being developed by Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc representatives/“stakeholders.”After all, it could be quite the story being told during the coming weeks, months, years – at least, that would be the prevailing optimistic expectation, eh. Again, you are yet another

[menoalittle]

>> Again, you are yet another person who implies that one could be“an insider.”Not as much as suggesting that you had inside information.  Just because you might have obtained certain "privileged information" doesn't automatically mean that you're "an insider."  Furthermore, I don't believe diddley squat about you say you're hypothetical position

[sherbet2]

Hello Menoalittle et al, Like noses; everyone has an opinion, Menoalittle. One thanks you for providing your own opinion as to ones neutrality and ones capacity to be honest.Additionally, you now all too conveniently decide to label one as being that which you consider to be “a manipulator”; how obvious of you to provide such an unsupportable assertion.You should think about changing