Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum American Creek Resources Ltd V.AMK

Alternate Symbol(s):  ACKRF

American Creek Resources Ltd. is a Canada-based junior mineral exploration company, which is engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties, principally for precious metal deposits. The Company’s projects include Treaty Creek and Austruck-Bonanza. The Treaty Creek Project covers approximately 114 square km in the Skeena Mining District of northern British Columbia and is... see more

TSXV:AMK - Post Discussion

American Creek Resources Ltd > Repricing of the stock options?
View:
Post by Alwayslate on Nov 09, 2021 9:41am

Repricing of the stock options?

Is this good for the common share holders or bad.  Help a newbee understand please.  Seems like that detail is omitted from the story.  Guess they just assume we all know how all this works.
Comment by CharlieWaffles on Nov 09, 2021 9:44am
No, not what you want. Remember to vote at the AGM Incentive Options Repricing American Creek Resources Announces Incentive Options Repricing (newsfilecorp.com) Stinger Resources Incentive Options Repricing (newsfilecorp.com)
Comment by CharlieWaffles on Nov 09, 2021 9:59am
I see a "TAKE" now what I would like to know is what was the "GIVE"? If no GIVE then at the AGM will be the time to vote accordingly. Let's see what else transpires until then. 
Comment by Yellowknifer69 on Nov 09, 2021 12:50pm
Hello and good afternoon Longs: Just wanted to offer up another opinion in regards to this morning's news. Could this reduction of share overhang have been proposed at the request of a potential suitor/ buyer?   This type of move is often risky and not often undertaken by a company unless a) they are desperate for cash?  Not the case here.  or B) There is another master ...more  
Comment by Alwayslate on Nov 09, 2021 1:12pm
I was thinking/wondering this exact thing.  Is something big happening in the background?  Fingers crossed.  
Comment by NamesJeb on Nov 09, 2021 1:17pm
I don't really see how reducing options prices for management would in any way create a "reduction in share overhang". If that were the case, they're just pushing back any chances of that until it's voted on late December. I think management exercising their options at the current price right now would potentially do such a thing. But maybe I'm missing something?
Comment by NOMOREROLLBACKS on Nov 09, 2021 11:29am
I WILL VOTE NO WITH MY MILLIONS OF SHARES.
Comment by NamesJeb on Nov 09, 2021 9:50am
It's basically like asking management to give us a rebate for whatever the difference in price we paid per share vs the price of 0.18. You think they're going to do the same for us? Undoubtedly!
Comment by LonghandStrong on Nov 09, 2021 11:03am
I think we are all finally seeing exactly what they care about. Rewarding yourself for poor stock performance is a hallmark of a poorly managed junior IMO
Comment by LonghandStrong on Nov 09, 2021 11:04am
ironically, as AMK is just a drag along now to Tudor, the $ provided (further dilution) from these repriced options will come back to them in the form of fat exec salaries, earned for doing what exactly?
Comment by CharlieWaffles on Nov 09, 2021 11:19am
Uhm, proven up 5M OZ. Try to keep up here. 
Comment by CharlieWaffles on Nov 09, 2021 11:39am
This does bring up an important point and perhaps a reason to stop and think ahead a little. First thing is I would hope to hear a valid reason as to why this was done, that would be a good starting point. If no reason or the reason isn't satisfying then next step.    Big picture, AMK free carry meaning no drilling expense. We are fortunate enough to get all our drilling paid for ...more  
Comment by HIGHonLITHIUM on Nov 09, 2021 1:24pm
Waffles, I'm surprised at your reactions here. These are not new options being granted so who really cares? Maybe more to this than meets the eye? Are you also going to trash TUO management for repricing options? Or did you miss that TUO news? What about if Tudor follows suit? Going to call up Walter and let him have an earful? Maybe you are being a tad short-sighted here in your assessment of ...more  
Comment by NamesJeb on Nov 09, 2021 1:31pm
Unless management wants to give us another reason, all we can really do is take it at face value. Reducing price of existing options which are converted to shares = less overall money for the company and more shares outstanding = potentially insufficient funds to keep paying the bills and riding the free train = potentially more dilution later.
Comment by NamesJeb on Nov 09, 2021 1:34pm
With that said, I suppose one could argue that at the old higher prices management potentially would not have exercised their options and therefor = 0 money for keeping the lights on. Therefor a bunch less money is better than no money at all.
Comment by CharlieWaffles on Nov 09, 2021 3:21pm
Does this undue all they've done? We don't have to be so dramatic. I am a huge fan of not only what they've accomplished but what they had to endure and get through to get here. Not an easy feat. That's why I'm surprised. This isn't an issue about options issued, it's cutting the yardstick by half, that's the issue.    Now let's say we ...more  
Comment by CharlieWaffles on Nov 09, 2021 11:18am
What are you talking about "Starting to see finally"? Have you not been crying about bad management and this is your first example? Why would you say that previously then? 
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities