Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Andover Mining Corp. V.AOX

A precious and base metal exploration company

TSXV:AOX - Post Discussion

Andover Mining Corp. > Utah Property
View:
Post by potts1 on Feb 26, 2014 2:38pm

Utah Property

Folks, I think we are on the wrong track here. Andover Mining Corp owns 83.5% of Chief Consolidated Mining Company. Chief is an Arizona corp., registered as a foreign entity legally doing business in Utah. Sherman Young, an Andover director is listed as Chief’s agent in Utah. To my knowledge, Chief has not been forced into or filed for bankruptcy. What Andover’s trustee has available for sale is not any of the projects, joint-ventures, land or any other assets held in Chief’s name. The question is who is likely to acquire the Chief stock and at what price.
Comment by souwester on Feb 26, 2014 3:08pm
Precisely. Lots of potential issues re subsidiaries, however. Sun on the other hand is a wholly owned subsidiary. A nightmare which could have been avoided.
Comment by dosco on Feb 26, 2014 3:36pm
83 pc is a lot... who knows who owns the rest. if chirf decides to sell and give aox the proceedings then mothers debt is paid. why should we protect as owner chief... are dead anyway. 83pc means the remaining 17pc have a problem.
Comment by souwester on Feb 27, 2014 6:45am
potts1, Makes one wonder: why didn't Andover just pledge its shares in the subsidiaries as security for a loan? Presumably, the shares per se were totally unencumbered.
Comment by potts1 on Feb 27, 2014 10:30am
I don't know but Chief stock became unlisted once acquired by AOX. I suspect in today's lending environment, difficult to establish a value for the shares.