Pacific Booker Minerals Inc V.BKM

An Example of Reproducibility and Common Sense

[$500,000Salmon]

Harvey McLeod, a world class engineer, designed the tailing pond for BKM. Then the BC gov hired Professor Laval, who is the head of civil engineering at UBC, to validate the water quality and difusser data presented by BKM, which he did. 

The protocol needed to evaluate the water quality and the difusser capacity is obviously necessary. 

My guess is that the data and many of the technical terms used were unfamiliar to most LBN, as they would be to most people. 

BKM sharing anything technical with LBN likely landed on mostly deaf, and untrusting ears. Instead, if they just focused on the fact that the water quality is good and that the salmon have been thriving even after the 2 previous mines were operated for many years (1966 to 1982 and 1972 to 1992), then I would think common sense would be more likely to take over and a much higher % of LBN would accept the project as being safe.

[BKMforthewin]

Good info Salmon, perhaps BKM should consider taking another approach, if there is so much concern with the salmon species and count of fish in Morrison Lake, then partner up with LBN on a fishery initiative that would guarantee the sustainability of the salmon coming out of the Morrison? How hard could it be to take care of a few thousand fish, of which none are genetically unique to the morrison