Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Pacific Booker Minerals Inc V.BKM

Alternate Symbol(s):  PBMLF

Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. is a Canadian natural resource exploration company. The Company’s principal business activity is the exploration of its mineral property interests, with its principal mineral property interests located in Canada. The Company is in the advanced stage of exploration of the Morrison deposit, a porphyry copper/gold/molybdenum ore body, located approximately 35... see more

TSXV:BKM - Post Discussion

View:
Post by DukeHauser on Jul 02, 2022 2:53pm

Meeting

Why will you  not be at the general meeting? Sounds like you should be there.
Comment by CopperBull2021 on Jul 02, 2022 4:20pm
Because nobody listens.  The shareholder group has groupthink.  People have been trying to tell John and the shareholders this stuff for years.  Nobody listens.  The big shareholders believe John's BS and give him his 96% approval rating year after year. Just look at how many people are blaming FN for PBM's failure to get a certificate.  Like PBM not submitting a ...more  
Comment by uptowndog1 on Jul 03, 2022 11:02am
I beleive some of what you say, but when you say FNs have not much to do with decision, I disagree 100%, they in my opion have stopped our EAC because of there hate for John , Eric and a few others in BKM. IMO
Comment by CopperBull2021 on Jul 03, 2022 1:08pm
FNs do not have veto over resource projects in BC !  The Morrison project would not be approved even if FNs agreed to it.   PBM has no need to even think about FN support until their input is received during consultations of the new application.  That is at least a year away.  When PBM has started a new application and the terms of reference have been agreed to and the ...more  
Comment by travelinbanker on Jul 03, 2022 9:59pm
CopperBull, I agree with much of what you say. However, your continual lack of focus on LBN is out of line. I had things worked out in 2014 with the Dep Min & an email from the Minister of Environment, telling me they were aware of my communication with the Dep Min and felt I should continue down that path. I had things worked out with the Dep. Minister on what the Minister was wanting and ...more  
Comment by CopperBull2021 on Jul 04, 2022 12:20am
Re:"However, your continual lack of focus on LBN is out of line." I rest my case.  PBM's next 10 years is going to be exactly like the last 10.
Comment by uptowndog1 on Jul 04, 2022 11:44am
When you say FNs have nothing to do with permit, there hasn't been a project or very few that have made it without FNs,  THEY HAVE THE FINAL SAY IN EVERY PROJECT ON OR NEAR THERE LANDS. PERIOD
Comment by CopperBull2021 on Jul 04, 2022 2:33pm
If you read the legistlation and study other projects, the proponent is required to adequately consult and mitigate the effects of the project they are proposing, for all stakeholders.   It doesn't say that stakeholders need to be approving or have a share in the project. As I've clearly stated many times, the Ministry did not like technical aspects of PBM's mine plan.  ...more