Post by
Wangotango67 on Sep 26, 2024 7:05pm
SPIROL125 ( ceo.ca poster )
SUMMATION
Grosso should consider redirecting LIT into uranium
Grosso could then aquire mass tracks of prospectus uranium lands for bsk + lit
Focus is then centralized on uranium ( stremlines ) drill rigs same vicinity, geo's same.
URANIUM
Where's the source ?
Uranite or Pitchblend
Phosphate natrally has uranium bonds ( phosphate is a safe bet )
Violets ?
What are they ?
Could be manganese and..... calcium can also sport violet coloration.
( Manganese Rhodochrosite ) or ( calcium Erythrite )
Manganese can act as an immobilzer to uranium.
Calcium limes will also bond with uranium and convert to nonsoluble - immobilzer.
BSK's claims 60 km west of Anelo have the violets in spades.
Calicium or.... manganese.
Limited free roam calcs - sparse carbonates.
Limited phosphate - very pale green seen amongst the 150m width shales.
Limited redox activity = limited S, P, K, Na, etc to provoke further transitions.
If uranium is present with in 120m - 150m thicknesses = static no mobilizing no catalysts
Limited to no visual calc crusting beds below shales in basins.
2 glowing rocks were seen in basin below 150m shales.
Points to.... uranium is in the phosphates. ( or... highly probable )
Again... limited phosphorus green amongst the violet shales and lower basin of shales.
Chihuidos Flats - watersheds brought the phosphates in ( surficial )
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54020189105_65b1d799a1_c.jpg
Upper right image - BSK claims
compare
Los Indos Mining ( sw of Anelo )
Los indos mining has the ( yellow / green phosphate / sulphur crusing at surface )
Violets few meters deep
Sands below violets ( no mining of sands )
= mining washed remnants of uranium - thin beds - no real tonnage
= uranium dilution due to mineral bond conversions 50% or less uranium
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54022885534_af0ea90802_b.jpg
^^^
Same image above right side = Ranquil
170 km nw of Anelo
dark patches are very deep violets
amongst the deep violets is an equivelent amount of.... very dark phosphate.
very dark = more condensed minerals
has phosphates even in pipe vent style phosphate pools
= source
122 km nw of Anelo
lots of colors
lots of redox activity ( conversions )
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54022121961_9731986af5_b.jpg
How can 170 km and 140 km be source of Los Indo mining ?
Los Indos has 2 rivers that intersect and basins that carry in minerals via rain / snow mels
Los Indos = end of the road diluted deposits - thin crustals.
170 km sw is an entirely new system with rainbow colors.
could be sulphides reacting with calcium carbonates = bright blues
or.... could be a fluorite as mentioned - fluorites reknown for relation to uranium.
1/2 = white, yellows, blues
1/2 = heavy green phosphates - upper right image - westerly
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54020751445_55795c0324_c.jpg
Where's the Uranium ?
I'd veer from redox uranium ( crustal )
I'd go north ( 122km and 171 km )
I'd test each color in it's natural state ( hasn't seen any conversions )
= one would know where the uranium is comining from
versus
= testing post caralyst crustals
I'd then regroup
bsk + lit
aquire district scale blocks of lands
one focus
2 juniors
massive lands
drilling ( easier to develop )
Geo's easier to manage
less costs
streamlined
My hunch ?
After scanning 10m - 30m birds eye above ground
190 km north and 171 km south
i'd place more focus - northly ( areas where i've outlined )
I'd say... it's the source
while bsk's violets are in vein formation = local from west
it's just so think of colored minerals - northly - i can't dismiss
throw in watershed movement
Los Indos mining surface crusts - why chase or mine diluted redox minerals vs source ?
= better to go north ( massive domes of every color )
Grosso or BSK may not be partial to what i've recommened but...
it's what i'd do.
There's my summation.
Take it, leave it, throw it away.
Cheers...