Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum biOasis Technologies Ord Shs V.BTI.H

Alternate Symbol(s):  BIOAF

Bioasis Technologies Inc. is a Canada-based biopharmaceutical company focused on research and development of technologies and products intended for the treatment of patients with nervous system, including central nervous system, diseases and disorders. The Company is engaged in the development of its xB 3 platform, which is a peptide-based technology, for the transport of therapeutic agents, in... see more

TSXV:BTI.H - Post Discussion

View:
Post by JDavenport on Jun 21, 2022 2:02am

NDAs

Here's a thought. All people with nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) who have no direct participation in partnerships, R&D and other general business activities should have their names publicly disclosed.

Influential shareholders, network nodes, brokers (involved in financings or not) who have NDAs should have their names disclosed to the public on SEDI or SEDAR. Investors in any kind of communication with such people should know whether otherwise secret details of the company have been revealed to that person. It should be publicly known that the person with the NDA has a special relationship with the company and may have knowledge of the company not otherwise avaiable or known to the investor. We don't need to have that information. We just need to know that people of influence have information that others cannot have.

I have always had such disclosures available in the public domain.

jd
Comment by cmonreally24 on Jun 21, 2022 3:11am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by Finallytherock on Jun 21, 2022 9:11am
here's a thought, the company realized there is no interest in their BBB platform. now they are scrambling to survive that they decided to go in this direction as a last hope. you got this one so wrong, jd. so, so wrong. 
Comment by narmac on Jun 21, 2022 9:57am
aaacchhhhhh,,,have the naysayers viewed the presentation??..,,have they seen the slides??....what is actually a lie in these slides??.......are you intentionally embarrassing yourselves here??....are you more in the know than the PhDs involved with this company??.....where lay your credibility??..all I can see is optimism,,,,,what in the presentaion was not???,,,,,there is only one way forward ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities