Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Bridge Resources Corp V.BUK

TSXV:BUK - Post Discussion

Bridge Resources Corp > WTF is this?
View:
Post by losvegas on Feb 18, 2009 8:28am

WTF is this?

"In order to address the amount of gas back-out of existing wells feeding the LAPS pipeline caused by the high pressure and volume Durango well, Bridge has agreed to allocate certain production revenue to such existing legacy LAPS well interest holders in order to make up for the diminished production of such legacy wells during the higher pressure and volume production period of the Durango well."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Has anyone previously seen any reference to paying other producers part of OUR revenue?
And just how much is it? That is material information and should have been disclosed.
Comment by Mrigs on Feb 18, 2009 9:42am
To finish the quote"The intention is that Bridge will recapture this production revenue at a future date from such legacy wells in an equitable manner. This back-out issue is being addressed by a formal Joint Reservoir Management Group to confirm equitable gas balancing and repayment procedures. "It looks as though we are giving out loans now.  A future business parter/deal could be ...more  
Comment by molymoney on Feb 18, 2009 9:55am
The way i see it we have about 30mmcf / day equivalent, but beacause of our increasedpressure the lower pressures wells in the area have to reduce production. Therefore wewill temporarily be enforde by UK REGULATIONS to pay them the difference in lost revenue.We will be compensated later as reviewed, but the problem is we don't know the amount of moneywhich we need now.The future targets we ...more  
Comment by mjl777 on Feb 18, 2009 3:20pm
Refer to the Dec. 18th release below. The fact that there were line balancing issues that were in the process of being addressed was disclosed in this news release and discussed on this thread. H/e, it would be nice to know just what proportion of the company's revenue is being allocated to existing legacy LAPS well interest holders. I suspect that this info. will be forthcoming, h/e, this ...more  
Comment by mikerosoft666 on Feb 18, 2009 3:39pm
So do I understand this correctly ?  We will have to compensate the other subscribers to the pipeline because our pressure is too high and superseding their flow ?  Or have I over simplified it ?And so now we are waiting for a number that will be subtracted from our revenue so we can figure out what the cash flow is worth ?Not a pipeline or Gas Well engineer so having some difficulty ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities