Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Canadian Critical Minerals Inc V.CCMI

Alternate Symbol(s):  RIINF

Canadian Critical Minerals Inc. is a Canada-based mining company primarily focused on two near-term copper production assets in Canada. The Company’s main asset is the 100% owned Bull River Mine project (>135 million lbs of copper) near Cranbrook, British Columbia, which has a Mineral Resource containing copper, gold and silver. It also owns a 30% interest in the Thierry Mine project (>1.3... see more

TSXV:CCMI - Post Discussion

Canadian Critical Minerals Inc > OCEAN PARTNERS UK ( Braveheart forward contract )
View:
Post by Wangotango67 on Aug 09, 2021 3:00pm

OCEAN PARTNERS UK ( Braveheart forward contract )

Would it not be in Ocean's best interest
to entertain a potential upgrading of copper ores ?

As one can read....
majority of my posts are to analyze what a junior has and make itt better, bigger, more profitable.

It;s good to see theamount of reads per post - just maybe the junior will see the benifits of
taking into consideration of, seeking out the cobalite values and mulling over the ide of switching up to a basic concentrate to say... processing the ores to arrive at a pure copper or, even a copper hydroxide for use in agricultural practices that  inhibit the growth of, fungi's.

Let's face it,
theres some real issues going on in the agricultural industry as per, droughts or, far to omuch water that encourages fungal growth on the crops. My prediction - based on reading news articles all over the wolrd - there just might be an ever increasing need for copper hydroxide to aide in the prevention of  crops infected with fungis.

How does one make copper hydroxide ?
Quite simple actually.
It's the merging of, copper sulphide with sodium hydroxide.
Instantly turns to a ready use copper salt.

Why bring this up ?
It might be a far quicker process to convert copper vs producing pure copper using anosizing.

What does copper hydroxide fetch ?
$ 6,000 - $7,000 usd
Not to oshabby, considering pure copper fetches $9,000 - $10,000 usd

Again.. such an idea might wncourage the junior to make those revisions from simple concentrate to a "  next level up " and fetch a far higher dollar.

If ever entertained, it would also benefit the " wholesaler " Ocean, as they too would make far more dollars as the in between selling a higher valued prodcut.

If Copper hydroxide feteches $6,000 - $7,000 usd
it's always the what if the junior captured 1/2 or more of the spot value ?
Ocean would also capitalize al lthe more on their end of the deal.
No longer would the contract be dealing in - hindreds -  but rather - thousands.

Here's a quick vidoe showing how easy tyher conversion is....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fi6iU4OJakQ

yeah.. that fast.
Hence - i would think if one factored time constraints when comparing pure copper with copper hydroxides hands down -  copper hydroxide would clearly allow a junior quicker processing and conversions of copper ores.


it's the ability to take a small rsource and place it in the calibre of peer competitors that have far larger resources and compete on cost ot mine value vs profit and turn a project into a project with very strong economics.

Half the battle is already won.
Resource proved, and mine equiptment is already set up.
This is a brown field project - not green.
Every reason to place a little more efforts into switching things up.
Considering other ideas.

Now.. .what would sway me to perfer electowinning ?
it would revolve on the premise of,
Cobalite grades.
If there was sufficient cobalt with in the ores - i would reccommend - electrowinnning.
All because cobalt can be extracted this way along side of the copper.

Cheers....

Ooops....
Just when one thinks they've posted al lthier tohughts, another thought comes round.
Wink.

Pssst.....Here Braveheart -  thisis a preferred XRF  for cobalt detection.
Not the run of the mill XRF... heck, rent one for a week.

LIBS = XRF
https://www.thermofisher.com/ca/en/home/industrial/spectroscopy-elemental-isotope-analysis/portable-analysis-material-id/portable-xrf-analyzer-selection-guide.html
Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities