In an older ( Zaxk's Report ) 39 page report - it shows a histroical pictoral where the mineralization is - approx 45 degree angle from surface to depth.
Why is this important ?
It would prove that the minerlaization has same projection path as the stringer arms coming off the nearest mountain.
Page - 14 - Zaxks Report Here we can see the depiction of the where the drill hit and the mineralization model in what is assumed in layout.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjCs-Got4nzAhUJGFkFHZIbDdsQFnoECAUQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fs27.q4cdn.com%2F906368049%2Ffiles%2FNews%2F2019%2FZacks_SCR_Research_08262019_V.BHT_Ralston.pdf&usg=AOvVaw17OGWDE1zwjXBLfoYHZytU Let's now compare the mine layout below grade - It's ( lateral / horixontal ) lformation -
Now, let's align the mine adits that all project from the main mine roads below grade and compass towards the mountain.
The question becomes -
is this a coincident ?
Or... more like the minerlaization does align to the maountain ?
Keep in mind - we can see the sulphide mineralization exposed at surface on the mountain.
If the mine portals and adits are stepped out from the mountan then...
what are trhe chances the mine is simply exploiting the - extension stringers - from the mountajn ?
It would mena.... the true deposit strikes into mountain - easterly -i
And the main mine belwo grade is catching the extension arms of the lower mountain arms.
Therefore... what sort of odds are there - for minerlaization to extend into the mountain ?
Here is - one portal - going directly into the mountain - seen in this pic-
Sulphides are extremely apparent -
So, why point all this out ?
Well... why drill deeper into the ore body when one should be focusing on the minerlaized
strike path and if ithe minerlazation is eminating from the mountain stringer arms,
then... it would be most logical to point the mine extension not deeper but rather going into
the mountain - easterly. Directly into the - sulphide mountain stringers.
In an older report - it was asked, if the mine was built right over the minerlaization ?
lol - yes and no... yes, applied ot current underground mine but no, if one enteres the side of mountain -
Now... there's a portal into this sulphide mineralization seen in pic - above.
Could be real simple ot check this access point for copper = cobalt.
Just open thoughts....
Comparing former mine theories to actual mine layout to seeing sulphides outside of mountain stringer arms.
For all we know....
The depoist could be stratabound - and stacked like books which created the mountain.
If at al ltrue.. .then, the logic to extending the mine into the mountain is far more practical than, drilling deeper.
Especially if it might be stratabound - it might mean the strata broke and each stacked to format a mountain - thus - drilling deeper might not be the answer but rather, focusing on the stacking of the strata -
Could the mine adits ( seen in black access points aligned with mountain ) point to the clue that deciphers how the minerlaization aligns with the nearest mountain with sulphides ?
I would say.. .yes.
If ever proved to be true...
It might mean the stratabound layers could span far into the mountain.
And such would place this prtoject into an entirely diff league.
Not hard to check that one LONE portal going into the mountain sulphides.
Cheers....