Post by
Waivergod on Jun 10, 2024 3:55pm
Stolen from poster on CEO board
It should be clarified that this is distinct from the Zn-Pb-Ag-Ge deposit which is >10Mt so far and in that case, copper is not economic. Rather, it is found in trace amounts and if you, like I have been, log every hole drilled on the deposit so far, will see a small but sustained increase in copper to the NE. The company has stated on multiple occasions that geologically this non-economic indicator is indicative that we're nearing the middle of the deposit. Which, given the high sustained grade and tonnage we're already at bodes extremely well and provides insight into why they are reluctant to do a 43-101 and establish a tonnage which doesn't provide a glimpse of what we (tacitly understand we) actually have. Private companies that have analyzed the data understand this fact though."
Smart guy knows better than you bears
Comment by
MassiveisKing on Jun 10, 2024 7:46pm
So why dear comrade have we no resource report. What are the top 5 reasons?
Comment by
Waivergod on Jun 11, 2024 6:28pm
If you read the comments on CEO -a poster there makes very valid points and seems to have some vast knowledge in the field of geology either professionally or as a need. He thinks that doing a resource report at this point is stupid because of the complex and possibly immense size of this project. Albeit he says they are working in the blind
Comment by
MrJimLahey on Jun 12, 2024 9:03am
have you tried calling Chuck and Chad to let them know they are wasting everyones time and money?
Comment by
coolshivers on Jun 12, 2024 9:28pm
No. That's a waste of time.
Comment by
Matteo1234 on Jun 13, 2024 7:11am
Pappi. Dont frustrate the Shiv. We appreciate him sopping up excess retail hamster dumping, Stayhard