Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum CANDORADO OPERATING CO V.CDO

TSXV:CDO - Post Discussion

CANDORADO OPERATING CO > Robert Shives
View:
Post by wildman2 on May 30, 2011 4:40pm

Robert Shives

Nuff Said.

V.GWQ =  from .10 to .56 and now sitting at .40 this year. 

He doesn't need a rollback to get a stock price going. 

Comment by agrossfarm on May 30, 2011 7:30pm
Shives had a drilling budget, a budget that caused a lot of dilution to raise.He had geophysics before he drilled.He had over 100 drill holes in the Aurizon Zone before he developed the model so he'd know where to drill, at what angle, and how deep. He had some historical drilling to go with the geophysics in the skarn. He had IP and ran deep IP and MMI, and a ground mag survey. They did grab ...more  
Comment by trader4ever on May 31, 2011 7:36pm
"Whether there is a reverse split or not is probably going to mean nothing in the longrun." Are you talking to those shareholder who hold since ten years already?However, unfortunatley you migth be right iin all you have been writing.. But in my case, my shares of CDO will have no value for twenty years.....well, obviously for you another 'longrun' is much less a problem than for ...more  
Comment by agrossfarm on May 31, 2011 8:20pm
I am going to give you some unsolicited advice. Although I have helped a lot of people with their investing, that doesn't mean I am always right, so I am only offering this to you as something you might want to consider.Mark-To-Market.What you paid is a sunk cost.You know you bought something that looked good at the time but turned out not to be as good as you thought.Each day, you can sell it ...more  
Comment by radar17 on Jun 01, 2011 12:19am
Ross - that post was messed up -  were you drunk when you wrote that??BTW - "I am going to give you some unsolicited advice. Although I have helped a lot of people with their investing, that doesn't mean I am always right, "Anybody that knows your posting, aka "unsolicited advice" history, especially with respect to GWQ, has got to be laffing their heads off. Please ...more  
Comment by trader4ever on Jun 01, 2011 10:19pm
agrossfarm, in case of logterm shareholder, who lost 90% of theri investment, this 'advice' has no value: It makes either sense to believe in an ongoing break-down of the current sharepricenor not to believe in a ten-bagger. Longterm shareholder - all here - just hope to get back a part of their losses. It would be idiotic to believe in a tgen-bagger and it would be idiotic to believe CDO ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities