Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Critical Elements Lithium Corp V.CRE

Alternate Symbol(s):  CRECF

Critical Elements Lithium Corporation is a Canada-based lithium exploration company. The Company is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development and processing of critical minerals mining properties in Canada. Its projects include Rose Lithium-Tantalum, Rose North, Rose South, Arques, Bourier, Dumulon, Duval, Nisk, Lemare, Caumont, and Valiquette. The Rose Lithium-Tantalum property... see more

TSXV:CRE - Post Discussion

Critical Elements Lithium Corp > Price Target from Eight Capital
View:
Post by Matteo01 on Dec 23, 2021 1:42am

Price Target from Eight Capital

I read the report from Eight Capital and find the $2.00 target to be too low.

The analyst used a discount rate of 9% instead of the 8% used in the feasibility study released in 2017.

He also applied a 15% discount to the NAV. The NPV used in his calculations is $462M (instead of the $723M after tax NPV from the feasibility study).

I noticed the analyst mixed up the prices for the chemical and technical grade spodumene in the report. On page 16 he says the price of chemical grade spodumene is $900/T and the technical grade is $750/T. On page 17 in Figure 1 the price of the 5% chemical grade is $750/T and the 6% technical grade is $900/T.

CRE used prices of $750/T for the chemical grade spodumene and $1,500/T for the technical grade spodumene in the 2017 FS. The technical grade has a much higher value than the chemical grade from what we’ve been told by management over the years.

The after tax IRR in the report is 23% compared to the 34.9% in the FS.

Piedmont is using a value of $900/T as a long term price for spodumene in their updated FS released last week. If CRE had the FS revised using updated long term prices we would have a much higher NPV, maybe closer to $1B after tax. Pilbara got $2,350/T in their last auction for 10,000 tons of 5.5% spodumene concentrate. I understand we can't use this as a long term price, but just shows there is room to the upside.


Matteo01
Comment by blaggers on Dec 23, 2021 9:20am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by Matteo01 on Dec 23, 2021 10:02am
Thanks Blaggers! To all the longs, Merry Christmas and best wishes for the New Year! Matteo01
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities