Critical Elements Lithium Corp V.CRE

Press release

[Bobbyjohnson]

I hate those sentences...

"Management is actively engaged in identifying the optimal strategic partner or partners to maximize benefits for all the Corporation's stakeholders, but at this time, there can be no guarantees as to the timing and outcome of this process."

[monkeyhere171]

..., but at this time, there can be no guarantees as to the timing and outcome of this process." WHY ADD THIS ONE??? Same old CRE, no more comments, kill the rally :(

[110158]

As usual a tremendous effect on each CRE news.....

[Bullatnl]

Unbelievable!  And we wonder why we are so undervalued! Its like they want a low share price.   

[bigops]

The reason this is added is precisely because so many on this Board and elsewhere continue to pull their hair out, stomp on the ground and throw tantrums each time a timing milestone is missed. Yes - there have been real delays....but I challenge anyone here to try and get a permit for a mining project delivered on time anywhere in this country. I for one appreciate that disclaimer -- it tells

[Speedypete]

 Better than the silence.   Our turn is coming fellas!  

[papaloapan]

The lawyers added that statement

[johng14]

Exactly... people don't understand that they can be held legally liable for promising something in a press release and not delivering.

[Wheeler]

Every PR comes with cautionary caveats regarding forward-looking statements, usually at the end of the PR, this seems to suffice for other companies however CRE always seems to go the extra mile to make sure that they cannot be held accountable for any of the timelines they suggest. Perhaps this is the result of their chronic timeline changing. I have screenshots of all the previous timelines

[Dareg]

Most companies simply invoke the " Safe Harbour" statement at the end of the NR. That has become a standard declaration of , " I'm Not Accountable". 

[johng14]

As much as those statement's may protect the company and the board, it is better to be safe than to be sorry from a legal point of view and there is legitamately no reason to open yourself up to a lawsuit from the shareholders in a simple corporate update, no matter how frivolous a lawsuit may be. I would even argue that omitting that sentence is insignificant to the short term stock price.

[monkeyhere171]

That a big stretch and how come all other juniors can put these statements at the bottom that no one reads and works for them? This management have proven to love shooting their own success down.  Im not saying this should be in the NR, I'm saying this shouldn't be right after the discussion about finances.

[pauliseminem]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy