CVR Medical Corp V.CVM.H

Question for the leaders?

[XTRMNVSTR]

At OleMule, ICT and some of the other leaders on this board. We know Global isn't going to give their  product away it is going to cost Medical something , in your opinions what is a fair price that Medical should pay Global? If the roles were reversed and you had shared in Global what would you want to receive? The reason why I'm asking this question and I would like an answer is because it seems like every body on this board just want to see it fail. As of now we ALL are making NOTHING maybe just maybe if this somehow makes it to the next stage with Medical owning everything it may have a chance to hit the market. I dont have a problem with Global getting shared but I do think .10 cents is way to low considering some of us bought shares at .30 cents, I don't have a problem with Global profiting when the rest of us profit. Your input is appreciated.

[Aquaman11]

Right now, it's unfundable because of the technicalities as much as the people!  They can change four quarters for a dollar, it's still the same people. I don't remember the details, ICT would for sure.  They had a fair offer from the restructuring group, but they were too greedy and acted in bad faith after they had agreed on the principles of an agreement that seemed fair

[Aquaman11]

..."additional shares" ...more like warrants or options as they can't have more control of the company, but less.  Royalties of some kind "for a certain period of time" (not into perpetuity!) or kick-backs of some kind at certain milestones would be another.  Not 8% royalties of MSRP into perpetuity.