Post by
fossi_2002 on Aug 29, 2023 10:26am
50L and 100L PGX ???
It is a mystery to me why Ceapro is simultaneously building a 50L PGX plant in Edmonton (completion I./24) and likewise a 100L plant (completion III./24) at a European global leader.
If the whole thing is called an "experiment" by Ceapro, why do they take a 2.fold risk?
Can the results of a 50L plant be so different from a 100L plant?
Anyone have any thoughts on this on the message board?
An important aspect of the higher loss is the increase in research expenditure, which rose from` 574 to` 927.
Comment by
fossi_2002 on Aug 29, 2023 10:45am
I absolutely agree with you.
Comment by
lscfa on Aug 29, 2023 12:29pm
"This approach should save time and money."