Doubleview Gold Corp. V.DBG

Tahltan Central Government

[Cr00ks604]

Although this shift in Doubleview’s approach is welcomed by the Tahltan Nation, it does not mean that the Tahltan Nation will support Doubleview’s continued work within Tahltan Territory or any related project development that may occur in the future. 

[Cr00ks604]

This part of the statement is all that matters. DBG will not be developing anything in Sheslay territory. The process for protection of the area is already proceeding forward. If they're not supporting continued work in the Tahltan territory whats left?  The only thing that will be left are the bag-holders who refuse to accept reality.

[Tgimon]

doubleing down on your short position, let's see how this works out for you smh

[Cr00ks604]

 Not my post on CEO.CA good to see there are investors smart enough to see the reality of the situation. "Read between the lines. This communication agreement is something Tahltan wanted not DBG. This is not an exploration agreement or IBA (impacts and benefits agreement). When Tahltan do close the door and make the Sheslay an area closed to mining activity, this agreement makes it