Comment by
GoldenArm on Jul 13, 2021 4:28pm
Good to hear the explanation of all they had to endure (external forces) and that they were able to manage it and bring the well in. I liked his enthusiasm and I wished he would go a bit into the progress of building the processing facility more but I'll take this.
Comment by
mrfrankl on Jul 13, 2021 6:54pm
This is incredible. The man really knows how to run a company
Comment by
Buyhigheatchips on Jul 14, 2021 6:51pm
Let's not make it harder for him by sh!tposting imprudently.
Comment by
Bertie20 on Jul 15, 2021 4:20pm
I get the feeling that they're pondering strategy currently. The most recent plan was to go off and test the unperforated sections of Wells 1 & 2, and then go back and test Well 4. There was no mention of wells 1 & 2 in the recent interviews, however, nor in the Well 4 announcement.
Comment by
Jimmyjohn1 on Jul 15, 2021 9:09pm
Curious how anything we post would effect a deal going through or not for them?
Comment by
SprengoM on Jul 14, 2021 8:34am
Here is an interesting paper. Of course, DME's situation is different which will be determined during the FEED study, but it gives idea of the process, equipment and average production costs.
Comment by
SprengoM on Jul 14, 2021 8:35am
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/M-Quader/publication/336995577_Modeling_and_cost_analysis_of_helium_recovery_using_combined-membrane_process_configurations/links/5e3f69c7a6fdccd96593044a/Modeling-and-cost-analysis-of-helium-recovery-using-combined-membrane-process-configurations.pdf?origin=publication_detail
Comment by
Bertie20 on Jul 14, 2021 9:13am
Very interesting; thanks for sharing. For the 99% purity I see breakeven is assessed at being around $187 per m cu ft. Given that DME are expecting $1,200 (and in some instances potentially much higher), it gives some indication as to how profitable the Holbrook Basin is likely to be.