Comment by
gold_Gold_GOLD on Feb 12, 2014 4:14pm
Sorry. . in case anyone is having some trouble making this out news releas says 11.2 G/T over 37.3 metres but in the NR is says 37.3 G/T over 11.2 metres.
Comment by
goindeeper on Feb 12, 2014 5:08pm
Good catch. I'd guess the 11.2 g/t over 37.3 m is correct though because one of the included higher grade intervals is 33 m from the start of the reported larger interval (unless the 'from 785.2' is a typo too). Also I am guessing anyone reviewing the press release would have scrutinized the headline more than the table.
Comment by
queensa on Feb 12, 2014 9:32pm
Thanks alot stockhouse for summarizing the least important part of the news release and thanks for especially not mentioning the EAG-13-527 415.7 g/t gold over 7.8 m from 226.2 m. We should be able to keep this secret for at least a few more months.......
Comment by
MaxT on Feb 13, 2014 12:11am
CONSIDERING that they are tapping into Another Very HIGH Grade Zone below the Red DOG intrusive and are hitting grades of 6000g/t =187 ounces/t....Yes I would agree that the stock forum write- up is very lame cheers ....MaxT
Comment by
Observer10 on Feb 13, 2014 8:55am
Where did you take your 6,000g/t ? or How did you arrive to this ?
Comment by
tomgranite on Feb 13, 2014 9:11am
It is clearly stated in the news release. Look at the title ''main zone extensions'' then look at ''section 2175''. The figure is actually 6,070 g/t and it is included in a deposit of 415.7g/t over 7.80 metres.
Comment by
Observer10 on Feb 13, 2014 10:52am
Thanks for answering my question. Sorry to MaxT. Best of luck to all.