Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum enCore Energy Corp V.EU

Alternate Symbol(s):  EU

enCore Energy Corp. is a clean energy company. The Company is engaged in providing clean, reliable, and affordable fuel for nuclear energy as the uranium producer in the United States. The Company is focused on producing domestic uranium in the United States. The Company only utilizes the In-Situ Recovery technology (ISR) to provide necessary fuel for the generation of clean, reliable, and... see more

TSXV:EU - Post Discussion

enCore Energy Corp > As far as I can tell, SD is on verge of becoming NRC
View:
Post by PulpCutter on Feb 29, 2024 7:14pm

As far as I can tell, SD is on verge of becoming NRC

"Agreement State".  House Bill 1071 would do that, and as far as I can tell landed on Gov Kristi Noem's desk today, having passed House and Senate almost unopposed.

https://fastdemocracy.com/bill-search/sd/2024/bills/SDB00006364/#actions

The bill would make South Dakota an "NRC Agreement State", just like Texas and Wyoming are, and have the state handle "one-stop applications".  The relevant federal statute (circa 2005) is listed in the bill's text, at the above link.

My sense it this would move Dewey-Burdock along more readily.

It's possible I am wrong, that what passed the SD House and Senate was an agreement on a revised text, but looks to me like it's the bill itself.

Be the first to comment on this post