RE:Need a As a shareholder since 1992, I firmly believe the last sentence of the previous post is the case. If this technology really is viable, the world would have beat a path to the company's door years ago. The only constants with this outfit through all of its changes in management over the last 31 years are these: 1. Insiders, i.e. board members, lend the company money at favourable (to them) interest rates. 2. Nothing ever comes of the sporadic announcements.
I have kissed the thousands of dollars I foolishly invested in this goodbye. But it makes no sense to sell my shares for obvious reasons. So I check in here from time-to-time in the faint hope a miracle occurs. Yeah, I know, dream on.