Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Green Battery Minerals Inc V.GEM

Alternate Symbol(s):  GBMIF

Green Battery Minerals Inc. is an exploration-stage company. The Company’s principal business activities include the exploration and development of natural resource properties. Its Berkwood Graphite Project is located within the jurisdiction of Quebec, in the Manicouagan Regional County Municipality, three hours driving time from the city of Baie-Comeau. Its Stallion Gold Project is located in... see more

TSXV:GEM - Post Discussion

Green Battery Minerals Inc > MAKE CANADA GREAT AGAIN ( British Empire )
View:
Post by Wangotango67 on Jul 16, 2024 4:47pm

MAKE CANADA GREAT AGAIN ( British Empire )

Where did Canada go wrong ?
We use to be a world class leader in mining / minng markets.

The Plan ?
Let's try to fix it.


ESG + NET Zero Complinces  -----> Green Tech Start Ups + Stakeholders + Gov

ESG + NET Zero
No problem.  Most agree with this.



ISSUE ?
In my opinion Green Tech Start Ups + Existing Tech joining the Green Cirlce Economy
has exhausted UK's Empire money machine. Countless hiring of new employees
along with costs associated to keep each up n running  vs  what have each of them
achieved to earn their worth ?

Technologies are good...
but to what extent should one devote such enormous eneries and funding if the cause
has not produced any profits = bad economics.

At Present
Canadian junior's with critical minerals are stagnent.
How can this be if critical minerals are so desperately needed ?

System
select projects chosen  ( crushes rest of economy moving forward / other projects
Gov weak on grant funding
17% grade project sits while 4.5% grade is moved forward
Juniors must link with Gov't  tech
Gov tech is not the best 

Weak Gov Funding
Weak Gov Tech
= doors wide open for = Foriegn Investment + Run to China
= Disadvantage Canada / British Empire

BC Silica - gone stateside
QC Graphite - going stateside
AB oilsands - going stateside

US has the $40 billion dollar chip plant in,
Arizona and another being built in, Tenessee.

What's Canada doing besides throwing billions at foriegn companies to set
shop up in Canada ?

Where did RB Lithium go back in the day ?
What happened to Nemaska Lithium ?

Here is Canada's Research Council  ( roster list )
https://nrc.canada.ca/en/research-development/research-collaboration/programs

Lots of Programs
Lots of R & D

Yet... throw a junior critical mineral project into this stew and it most likely will
never see the light of day... R & D will feast on it for years ultimately controlling
all aspects of it -----> ensuring it's own R & D survival monies.

It's the same situation with foriegn tech / Schwab 
Energy intensive, Employee intensive, Capital intensive
= Exhausting Canada + British Empire ( which could be concerning )

What's the Resolve ?
It would have to entail... Simplicity.
Less capital intesive, less confusing --------> streamline
With an outcome of 100% guarantee success

How ?
There is only one program Canada and British Empire need.
- Ore Processing with intent to stockpile reserves

Better mining proceeduees which capture all valued minerals in each project.
17% Cgr and deposit also has 8% Al, 10% Fe, 2.5% P,  50% Si  etc.... 

Ores are already being milled -----> Grab majority of elements.
Less tailings. 
No more tailing mined in future.

HOW DOES THIS RESOLVE WHAT IS NOW ?
Simply put, all projects enter into Gov extractions.
Ore characterization that focalizes on all valued minerals.
Minimal tailings ----> Better reclamations.

REFINING
High purity refining
better than ( example ) flake graphite with impurities which require sphericising to
correct conductivity. Flake, Lump limits each deposits fullest potential
versus - refining each element maximizes all element potential
= many deposits come in to play / qualify

BEST PART ?
High purity graphite ( grease )
High purity carbon
High purity silica or SiC ( moissanite )
High purity Aluminum, Titanium, Iron, Phosphorus, Boron...etc.

END SUM ?
You've matched China
You're a real contender
High purity elements that can be directed at various technologies - at will.

Gov apart of Extraction
Junior has resource
Together each link high purity elements to tech - worldwide.

ONE MAIN FOCUS
Simple extractive focus
Gov funding to junior to enter Gov extraction programs
More projects enter Gov extraction testing
= Market stimulous

   GOV
= Outlines set tonnages of each element in stockpile reserves
= High purity reserves act as tangible wealth ( credit rating / wealth of country )
= high purity elements on demand ready to use - Gov knows what, where who wants
= TECH comes to you buying minerals  ( vs ) tech team with jr - spin in circles )

= win / win
 

TECH
Gov nor Green start ups don't have all the technologies.
Gov with hp stockpiled elements ----> control mineral -----> control purchse future trace
= Simple
Private sectors contributes much of tecnology
Britian would save enormous $$$  less funds dished out to wef tech

With this type of " simple approach " Canada and British Empire streamline
reducing enormous amounts of capital funding while creating far higher odds of success.
Full control over traceable resources and their 2nd, 3rd... or more generations.


Simple
Effective
Reduces Costs
Less Confusion
Extractive Focus
Country creates stockpiles
Reduces Green Tech capital / employment worldwide ( excess )
Breaks circle economy keeping everyone sponning in circles
Promotes usable elements / emmulates china model
More projects come online
More odds of success
Less capital strain on British Empire 
Guards British Empire / from 3rd party stakeholder tech which creates potential adversary


Cheers...


This post is anther idea for Quebec or.., Canada.
Addition to, 4 Pack.

Comment by Silverad0 on Jul 16, 2024 5:18pm
ESG + Net zero = ZERO! We are in an awful mess.  Our governments have a stranglehold on our economy and especially manufacturing and mining.  No one wants to do business in Canada.  Far too many regulations, far to much woke krap made part of any permitting and now apparently if you dont have First Nations on board forget about getting to first base. The only thing that will save ...more  
Comment by woundedknee on Jul 18, 2024 9:18am
Entire countries have gone broke following this ESG agenda. (Environmental, Social and Governance)Then there is DEI (Diversity, Eduity, and Inclusion) which nearly killed The Donald. Most of all we have a dictator that as Silerad0 says, has all but driven foreign investment from Canada. We have some news today.
Comment by Silverad0 on Jul 18, 2024 10:16am
We need to stop being so smug in Canada.  We also need to make an attempt to actually learn what the facts are, what the truth is and recognise the gross extent to which we are being spoon fed propaganda in lieu of the actual news.  Yes, the Trudeau liberals control our media.  They block and censor what we say, what we watch and what we read.  This is FACT.  I do not fear ...more  
Comment by woundedknee on Jul 18, 2024 11:15am
We embrace TRUMP and what he stands for. The democrats, along with Zuckerberg's(sic) 450 million to harvest and cure mail in ballots was one of the reasons Trump lost in 2020. But complaining about a crooked election got you indicted or even sent to jail. In Pennsilvania, Trump was leading by 670,000 votes and they allowed ballots to be counted for another week and he lost. Read or watch ...more  
Comment by Silverad0 on Jul 18, 2024 6:05pm
We will be watching Trumps speach tonight.  The $45M/month pledge from Elon Musk is to confront the ballot shenanigans.  I hope, I pray no B S this time.  Let's not forget the Dems voting guidelines, "VOTE EARLY VOTE OFTEN"!
Comment by woundedknee on Jul 19, 2024 7:57am
What an amazing night!
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities