Post by
tylerreddick on Jun 26, 2024 8:42am
I simply cannot get passed this one item
In the March 18th news release, and I quote;
" The TCCWD is desperate for some technical victory on a limited re-write of the WSA so they can make a claim to retrieve their legal fees. This has no impact on the schedule of building Sage Ranch nor stopping its progress. "
That is not forward-looking guidance, or anything that can be covered by the butt-covering clauses at the end of every news release. That is presented as a statement of fact, which apparently turned out to be inaccurate. How many investors bought on that assurance? I just don't understand how that passes muster? JMO
Comment by
shneps on Jun 26, 2024 10:16am
And yet in Dearlol' posting was the following - "So just my understanding of legal opinion that everything should be fully settled in 2 months, afterwards the Sage ranch will going forward as scheduled." So, once again the beans slowly fall out of the can and the truth is realized.