Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Grosvenor Resource Corp V.GVR

Grosvenor Resource Corporation is a Canada-based natural resource company engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties. The Company holds a 100% interest in the Powder gold-silver property, which is located 75 kilometers (km) north of Kamloops, in south-central British Columbia, Canada. The property is comprised of two mineral claims and covers an area of approximately 121... see more

TSXV:GVR - Post Discussion

Grosvenor Resource Corp > Sedi release
View:
Post by AricanTwin on Oct 30, 2024 7:01pm

Sedi release

More Lisa share updates released nothing seems to have changed. Would have to say if there trying to file financials regulators maybe forcing updates.
Comment by lscfa on Oct 31, 2024 1:05am
Looks like Crossley granted her parents millions of options for god knows what (consulting work?) and did not report the transactions as insider trades even though she had control/direction over those options. What a dirtbag.
Comment by lscfa on Oct 31, 2024 1:47am
22.7M options granted to parents. I knew those consultant options were sleazy.   Dr. David Ouchterlony (Control or Direction)                             ...more  
Comment by lscfa on Oct 31, 2024 2:03am
KPMG must have demanded Reliq disclose the nature of the options paid to consultants and discovered this BS. Dr. David Ouchterlony (Control or Direction)     4394482 2020-12-02 2024-10-30 50 - Grant of options 2,800,000 4394483 2021-07-19 2024-10-30 50 ...more  
Comment by lscfa on Oct 31, 2024 2:23am
I don't think these "consultants" made any money exercising these options and selling the shares as many of the options were exercised very soon after issuance before the stock price could move. I've been saying for years these actions were a way for Reliq to circumvent private placement rules. It was stealth financing. These "consultants" were really just raisng funds ...more  
Comment by Mitch43 on Oct 31, 2024 4:05pm
Thanks Icsfa, intresting... So Crossley must be the name Lisa Ouchterlony got from some matrimonial event, pure coinccidence or else ... intrigued, I learned from a search there is a dr John Crossley listed in Vancouver (Reliq headquarter),so  I decided to call his office, in vain, because I learnt he retired in 2021... However it might still be useful if it could help to trace ...more  
Comment by Mitch43 on Oct 31, 2024 12:20pm
At this point , Any poster still claiming how great was L Crossley at runing Reliq with  her business acumen, and feeling sad ill health forced her to step aside from being Reliq CEO. should have their head examined  before getting called to testify as  complicit witness if/when the Judicial system will get involved.
Comment by lscfa on Oct 31, 2024 12:23pm
Crossley should be banned for life from managing a public or private co. 
Comment by lscfa on Oct 31, 2024 6:41pm
Not sure if the catch-up filings are complete but as of now it shows that Dr. David Ouchterlony (controlled by Crossley) and Dr. Mary Ouchterlony (controlled by Crossley) have sold none of the 20.6 million shares issued by exercise of options. That is a $11.1 million investment by the bank of mom and dad. Won't be surprised if there are more filings to come to show some or all of these ...more  
Comment by Reggie1 on Oct 31, 2024 9:41pm
Its definatley going to get litigious.  Everyone can see now why it trades the way it has on the US OTC.  People have ways of finding out things and responding in action.  Everyone knows now why she would never take any questions ever on Q call. A company culture that was obviously full of shleps doing as she directed them to do.  Well maybe in part they were correct when ...more  
Comment by lscfa on Nov 01, 2024 2:46am
updated tables....   Dr. Mary Ouchterlony                                 Transaction ID transaction date ...more  
Comment by aaaaaargh on Nov 01, 2024 10:37am
I just want to say that I appreciate all of your hard work and amazing due diligence.  Any chance that you would like to take on a CEO role.  I know of a company that could use someone like you !!!
Comment by lscfa on Nov 01, 2024 12:06pm
Bloody Crossley did not disclose the exercise price on the option grant reports so I inferred them from subsequent exercises. Then I checked to see if  the exercise prices were below market prices at the time. They were not so no skullduggery.           TSXV  ...more  
Comment by lscfa on Nov 01, 2024 1:51pm
More analysis. Look how quickly options were exercsied after granted. No time for price to increase. Consultant's options nothing more than stealth financing to circumvent private placement rules.     Dr. David Ouchterlony          ...more  
Comment by lscfa on Oct 31, 2024 12:22pm
More analysis.... Total proceeds to co. from exercise of options by 2 "consultants" 2021 to 2023 = $11,184,900.  So Crossley was full of it when she said no financing required. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total gain by 2 "consultants" on exercise of options = $1,239,585 Most of these gains were in 2021. Later exercises were done mostly for small losses, supporting ...more  
Comment by builder1 on Oct 31, 2024 1:56pm
Nicely done lscfa. Back in the day, these "under the radar" financings were called "gypsy swaps".  Infuriating that Lisa & Scott were claiming: no need for financing, pursuing a nasdaq listing, profitability, etc.  Incredible misrepresentation and incompetence.
Comment by lscfa on Oct 31, 2024 3:57pm
I think these catch up filings of long ago insider trades is a major reason for the delay. Some of these late filed trader reports even have amendments to the amendments. Crossley is totally incompetent. Why did anyone think a chemical engineer could run an IT co.? And calling herself Dr. Crossley is the most misleading of all.
Comment by lscfa on Nov 01, 2024 6:49pm
more late filings of insider trading by Crossley. The idots first filed reports for David Ouchterlony showing only options exercised with a current balance of 10,440,000 shs owned. Today they filed revised reports to show shares sold in 2021 and current shares balance of 7,330,000 shs owned. Crossley should be doing all this reporting work at her own expense but I bet the damn co. is paying ...more