Post by
rampage1 on Nov 26, 2011 8:55am
ROULSTON FROM LAST WEEK
unfortunately Lawrence Roulston has a terrible track record when it comes to stock picking. GWY has a low share price because it is a very difficult deposit, in fact at these prices it may be overvalued ! don't believe me ? look at Mineweb this morning re: article about CB gold expanding land package but NOT at all interested in GWY !!!!!!!!
Comment by
misty18 on Nov 27, 2011 10:25am
Really!!!!!!Is it the same reason I haven't consolidated the area.What could CBJ possibly offer GWY?With Cali in their back pocket, I would saynothing unless GWY did spin out Vetas as a stand alone project.My 2 cents
Comment by
oldtimer42 on Nov 27, 2011 11:31am
Just so folks do not get misled by Rampage's comments, the link to the Mineweb article follows. It is a non story, no idea why it was crafted in the first place. https://www.mineweb.com/mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page66?oid=140504&sn=Detail&pid=102055
Comment by
dmuy on Nov 27, 2011 1:26pm
Really? Do you expect them to say they are interested in GWY's property? You're very naive.
Comment by
bepractical on Nov 27, 2011 1:45pm
I would much rather be a holder of GWY than CBJ at this point in time. To date, Galway results at both projects are impressive and it is quite likely that assay results from the hole(s) adjacent to the CBJ hole will light a fire under the share price. We are sitting in a highly unique exploration space and this fact will soon be recognized by the market.