Post by
Wangotango67 on Nov 04, 2021 11:26am
Kramer...
You're not a miner you're a - whiner.
I have read the top of page 55.
And... i still - think - here would be higher mineral values over 180m vs few cm.
If you haven't figured out what i've been driving at over the past few posts is,
Lab issue.
You see Kramer... if the lab didn't test the iron values, or is it, document them, ,then what sort of lab test is that ?
Irons are mentioned in the tech report, and as so, the irons could still be harboring the oxide metals. Nature can't create a sulphide without first being an oxide.
Period.
You sure are " partial " to these claims, Kramer.
And extremely protective - not wanting - any success...lol
Chill.