Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum HPQ Silicon Inc V.HPQ

Alternate Symbol(s):  HPQFF

HPQ Silicon Inc. (HPQ) is a Canada-based technology company specializing in green engineering of silica and silicon-based materials. The Company is engaged in developing, with the support of technology partners PyroGenesis Canada Inc. (PyroGenesis) and Novacium SAS, new green processes to make the critical materials needed to reach net zero emissions. Its activities are centered around the... see more

TSXV:HPQ - Post Discussion

HPQ Silicon Inc > Why is Nano One moving and not HPQ?
View:
Post by Good4You on Dec 21, 2020 4:28pm

Why is Nano One moving and not HPQ?

Can someone please tell me the difference between these two promising products in the EV batteries sector, and why having two Co in the process of delivering their first samples at about the same time to one major auto maker, NNO has Moved UP 20% Friday and 25% today, while HPQ seems almost stagnant. Is it a marketing or promotion problem? Or is one Product offers better possibilities than the other? Really I would appreciate your comments. Thanks HPQ Patient, Long and Strong Good4You
Comment by ELMillionaire on Dec 21, 2020 4:35pm
Maybe people are waiting if Bernard going to deliver the samples. Hes very hard to get you know what im saying.
Comment by rawdeal on Dec 21, 2020 4:41pm
I posted a couple reasons up earlier one being that nano has a name to client. The second being that they don't carry a large float like each PQ does so moves get exaggerated. As far as the management and the promotion I don't know too much about what nano has done but HPQ has been very active and evidently not seeing the same results as nano. I believe it's imperative that Bernard ...more  
Comment by Breizh1 on Dec 21, 2020 5:05pm
i THINK I know the answer: Bernard has gto get some training from Santa. Santa always delivers. Bernard does not know the address of the major auto manufacturer. But Delivery is Imminent!  Delivery imminent.
Comment by MadMonkey on Dec 21, 2020 4:55pm
They make batterys with Graphite replacing cobalt...Got a deal with auto company....Looks promising but they don't use silicone, and all engineers know thats the holy grail for batterys.
Comment by Casavantsghost on Dec 21, 2020 5:03pm
Does it not make you wonder with such a fundamental technical difference, how the asker of the question could even be invested in HPQ? I mean it is absolutely mind blowing the soft intimation of ohhh why is HPQ is such a poopy company all should sell now mantra. Can't be much above 21 years of age. Just cannot be.  
Comment by patience123 on Dec 21, 2020 5:10pm
They dont use silicon because the Cathode does not use silicon its the other side of the battery.  HPQ is the anode side and it does use silicon.  Technically the two companies are as closely related as a box company that makes cardboard and a staple company thats used to put the boxes together.
Comment by Breizh1 on Dec 21, 2020 5:02pm
Is one product offer better thatn the other? you ask. Your question is the answer. One is a product offering (real product). while the other is a promise of delivery. It has been said before: Production is IMMINENT. Production is IMMINENT. Production is IMMINENT. Production is IMMINENT. Production is IMMINENT.....
Comment by MidtownGuy on Dec 21, 2020 8:21pm
It's not the same timeline. Nano One is a couple of years ahead. The NR with the "global automaker" this week is actually the second auto company they've signed. The first was in June 2019. This second order heavily validates and de-risks the company. Second, they are not new to higher stock price territory. As far back as 2018 they were $2.40. Finally, that have one third ...more  
Comment by SKMoTo on Dec 21, 2020 8:41pm
Nothing a couple of Amazing NR's and a 3->1 Reverse split couldnt fix......  Happy Holidays!
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities