Comment by
lettermen7 on Feb 15, 2021 9:41pm
I think the increased coverage/visibility is great... granted some videos are a bit "amateur", but as investors we should be happy with coverage and exposure (for both HPQ and PYR)... some of these videos are quite informative, I enjoyed the mike jones ones...
Comment by
Koooo on Feb 15, 2021 9:42pm
Science... call it what you want. The people that are investing here and will be investing here because of them videos are very happy to be involved. You try to make it sound like it's a bad thing. I can assure you the longs here are not in agreement with you.
Comment by
StevenBirch on Feb 15, 2021 9:50pm
He's a wet blanket, puts a negative spin on everything.
Comment by
ScienceFirst on Feb 15, 2021 9:57pm
StevenBirch is a Proudboy. You should have seen him over the alst months.
Comment by
paul0316 on Feb 15, 2021 10:01pm
Im with you on that one. I see nothing wrong with the word being spread about PYR and HPQ. The more eyes on this the better. It shouldn't matter if they're amateurs or just here for a quick buck. More and more shares are falling in the proper hands as every day passes by.
Comment by
ScienceFirst on Feb 15, 2021 10:07pm
Koooo ... I've known HPQ and PYR since 2016. So I don't think I need you to tell me what to think. I'm in HPQ (May 2020 @0.08$ ) and PYR (March 2017 @0.32$) since a long time. These amateure traders are simply here for the short term. Not me. And just like PYR's CEO, I'm not here for "perceived valuation".
Comment by
Koooo on Feb 15, 2021 10:15pm
Science ... People who own a stock don't usually criticize what's in their best interest. So something wrong with that picture. I would have to say that your motives aren't pure.
Comment by
Koooo on Feb 16, 2021 12:36pm
Science... I think maybe you invested in the wrong company. You are apparently doing what you say you don't like doing. Come back in a few months when their earnings are rising and then you can feel better about your investment. I mean really
Comment by
patience123 on Feb 16, 2021 12:33pm
HPQs SP is presently 14% of PYR....what would you think is a fair valuation given the fact PYR can take 50% of HPQ nano at anytime? and that the world energy market is adopting silicon as a primary ingedient in a multi billion if not trillion dollar change to human scociety? So your saying a spike to 1.57 is overpriced and too high? I
Comment by
Koooo on Feb 16, 2021 1:32pm
STEVEN... about May 20th 2020 pyrogenesis shares were at about $0.90. By about the first week of July they were over $6. That's nine weeks . They are now about $11..00.. The right samples out in the next week or two and a couple of contracts you can bet we'll be above 6 bucks in the not-too-distant future. All Long's here believe that that is achievable.
Comment by
StevenBirch on Feb 16, 2021 2:19pm
I agree 100%. This is playing out, eerily almost, just like PYR.
Comment by
dougkimbrough on Feb 16, 2021 1:06pm
Sciencefirst... I KNOW YOU NEED A LESSON IN SPECULATIVE GROWTH STOCKS!!!! So here it is....Buy back in before we hit $2 while you can and you'll still make a killing!!! I BELIEVE THIS 100%!!!!!!
Comment by
developbc on Feb 15, 2021 10:45pm
As stated on the weekend Yes they barely scatch the surface and don't even understand %complete accounting etc etc. But the huge blessing is that they reach an audience SH might not. Nonetheless is great to see more eyes and attention...free coverage :)