HPQ Silicon Inc V.HPQ

Just re-read the Oct 21st release

[Moneycat]

Am I missing something. To me it reads like it is only a 20 percent savings compared to traditional methods. Am I reading that right ?? Obviously any savings is good but I was expecting a lot better of a savings for companies to want to use our product . What am I missing ??

[developbc]

Actually that is referring to the raw material feestock required to produce 1MT of Silicon. Note also Conventional process need 6 MT 99.5% SiO2 of Feedstock to produce 1 MT plus uses dirty GHG emitting low ash coal.  Can't scale small like Purevap QRR as well...huge capex difference.  THE PUREVAPTM QRR: GAME CHANGING VERSATILITY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL PROCESS Conventional plants:

[CrazyProphet]

The way I read it is its a 25% reduction in material to produce 1 MT of silicon leading to a possible 20% reduction cost than lowest cost producer.(20% on 1 MT) Thats a 20% reduction on each MT produced thats on top of not having to use extremely pure feedstock ?  If that makes sense and I have understood it the correct way sounds like a big savings to me ?