Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Integrity Gaming Corp. V.IGAM

"Integrity Gaming Corp is a provider of gaming equipment and project financing to owners, operators, and managers of casinos and other regulated gaming venues. The company focuses on U.S tribal gaming markets where it leases and distributes slot machines, electronic table games, casino, and bingo equipments."

TSXV:IGAM - Post Discussion

Integrity Gaming Corp. > Revenue increased 448%
View:
Post by RegularJoe on Apr 30, 2015 11:30pm

Revenue increased 448%

Revenue increased 448% to $551,640 from $100,573 in Q4 2013. The increase in revenue was due a higher number of deployed gaming machines in Q4 as compared to the prior year period.
Comment by MadmanX on Apr 30, 2015 11:39pm
This is getting interesting now. :) Tomorrow should be a great day!
Comment by biggerr on May 01, 2015 1:13am
this is lots of coins
Comment by biggerr on May 01, 2015 10:18am
why are they comparing the 2014 results to the 2013 results? In 2013 PYD wasn't even a gaming company, it was some fort of a penny-stock resource company, only after the RTO in May 2014 they became a gaming finance co', correct me if I'm wrong
Comment by RegularJoe on May 01, 2015 10:26am
Because they were publicly trading in 2013, regardless of the business model that have to compare cause that is the exchange standard. 
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities