Post by
Wangotango67 on Dec 04, 2015 11:35am
TJ - i get the advantage of pyd accumulating contracts
I want them to - and like i said the other day - with each new contract each amassing of slot machines - it eventually gets applied to the share outs - and with such a counter - it eventually has to raise the share price up -
Now as for your math - why the 6.7 ebitda?
average estimate - middle of the road?
And could you elaborate on the fact - you were just talking about a new contract - similar to Tonkawa - and you're saying for every contract like tonkawa - its a value of .105 cents or translates to a .10 cent rise in stock - right?
But why not give an over all expectation -
saying... if pyd was to buy back shares it would do this... not much on the stock price...or
would it ? seems no one can figure out what the cause is - thats preventing this stock from rising...
hence if it is a possibility that a buy out is a possibility - it would explain away the current price - and uneventful rise each time we get advancements and good news.
if what others are saying on the board - the stock is being held back - then would it not be in pyd's favor to buyback shares - more for them in the latter - if a buyout occured?
And at the same time - it helps out shareholders - getting more for their shares...
Never been in a situation with a buy out or take over - so i dont really know -
So - back to your math...
From what i gather - your saying for every contract pyd has - alike or similar to tonkawa -
and from what im guessing your saying - that there could be another one coming up ?th
en for every such contract = equates to-= .105 cents in stock value based on 350 million shares out.
Please include all variables and parameters -
all current and exisiting contracts and then the assumed potential of another tonkawa contract - and then would it still fall under the category of 6.7 factor ? or a 10x factor?
then project this supposed new contract - and TACK IT ON TO THE EXSISTING CONTRACTS - to get an over all value in share price... excluding it away from the herd of exsisting contracts gives a false impression of stock value.
Then... throw in the loop -
1- its prime opportunity pyd to scoop up shares - thinking futuristcally -
2 - creates more investor interest based on less shares out - more investors = attractant
3 - lowers risk with less shares - less chance of a consolodation - eases fears from investors promotes investment.
4- any future gain or acquisition - is then appreciated and respected and perhaps instantly reacts to each press release accordingly - no lag - or ill effect.
5 - company with more shares in own hands - builds confidence in investors that the company has confidence in own self - and reflects the same to investors with the impression - company believes in self.
6 - if ever a buyout did occur - stock would command a far higher price - benefiting company and shareholder...
stock buy back to me is by far a perfect assurance on all fronts.. it provides many advantages - and sets the company up for a perfect smooth ride with perfect stock response each time new growth is added.
So back to your math - TJ
Provide an overall value of this stock - of course a projection and estimate - based on - if pyd secures yet another contract to that of Tonkawa...
Pro assessors are already pegging this stock at - .17 - to a high of .26 cents... are you suggesting it could be valued even higher ?if pyd secures another similar contract to that of Tonkawa?
Appreciate your feedback... i like your posts... and such a topic is good to discuss -