Post by
jediknight on May 08, 2014 3:36pm
Drill moving
10 kms west to new site. My gut tells me they have a good idea where to sink it.
Comment by
DenvCol1 on May 08, 2014 10:20pm
Jedi, if they hit kimberlite 10 kms west of Kelvin and Faraday, watch out!
Comment by
DenvCol1 on May 09, 2014 8:38pm
!0 kms west of the Faraday/Kelvin trend places the new drilling location in the western area of Kennady Diamonds lease area right below the Margaret Lake Diamonds lease area. I just realized this when I examined the map of the lease areas. Jedi, where did you read that the new location will be 10 kms west of Kelvin/Faraday?
Comment by
jediknight on May 10, 2014 12:57pm
DC I think if memory serves that in a recent PR it was stated that they were taking one on the drills west to commence drilling at a target they have. As to the distance I might be incorrect.. But the drill was moving west.
Comment by
DenvCol1 on May 10, 2014 6:32pm
Jedi, thanks for the info. The distance does not have to be exact. What I find so interesting is that if Kennady Diamonds hits diamond bearing kimberlite at this new west drilling location, it would make the southern part of the Margaret Lake Diamonds lease very prospective!
Comment by
jediknight on May 10, 2014 6:37pm
The real action over the next 18-24 months will be KDI and mpv. DIA will be a bit player. Might hit,might not. We know where we are going.
Comment by
DenvCol1 on May 10, 2014 6:57pm
I think we can both agree that the west drilling location is very important!
Comment by
DenvCol1 on May 10, 2014 10:57pm
Jedi, let's see if the Canadian Shield still has room for some additional large diamond deposits!
Comment by
whiteirish on May 13, 2014 3:19am
Margaret Lake potential ? Paint your wagon if you think so. https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/v.ggl/ggl-resources-corp?postid=22524868 Be careful; there's a lot that's already known up there and Margarert Lake looks like another GGL without the nickel. As if nickel ever mattered. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTymtAbaG08