Comment by
Kurd30 on Dec 20, 2010 12:17am
EOIM,Thanks for sharing the information. I believe there is significant potential with lfd, but this is not a sure thing as some claim. There are definite risks associated like anything else and those who claim this is risk free are not fooling anyone. Again, good work and thanks for sharing with the rest of us.
Comment by
good40 on Dec 20, 2010 4:17pm
EOIM... thanks for the info on 9 but which formation mentioned was below 1750 meters ? It clearly shows everythingbelow 1750 meters on their presentation... is water.Sorry if I missed it, but your description didn't say anything about below this level.
Comment by
EOIM on Dec 20, 2010 4:34pm
Good40,I called the company to obtain answers and they will be updating that slide. That slide is not presenting the information correctly. The slide showing the strata at various depth contain more information as to the specific reservoir types in the field. The deeper formations contains high pressured gas that was not flow-tested due to technical problems.
Comment by
EOIM on Dec 20, 2010 5:02pm
See slide 12 in https://www.longfordenergyinc.com/files/file/Longford%20October%202010.pdf
It provides detail description of the lithology, rock unit, thickness and the reservoir type (oil, gas) as you drill from the Tertiary to Cretaceous and deeper into the Jurrasic and Trassic. This is a more reliable information.