Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Longford Energy Inc V.LFD

TSXV:LFD - Post Discussion

Longford Energy Inc > 260% Increase in Resources ?????
View:
Post by HHdoc on Feb 09, 2011 1:55pm

260% Increase in Resources ?????

Doesn't anyone look at the details of these resource reports?

The initial report from last year had a most likely recoverable of 132 million barrels (Jeribe only at Chia Surkh). The new report has contingent resources in Jeribe and Shiranish (condensate and gas = BOEs) for Chia Surkh and also has prospective resources in 2 new prospects/leads at Barda Sur East/West and also at end of Chia Surkh structure.
Adding all these numbers gives 338.6 million barrels, which is a 260% increase over the 132 number.

Well done management, ..... but not so fast!

At Chia Surkh, the Jeribe has gone from 132 million barrels to 60.2 million barrels. This is the "shallow, economic" zone which tested 4800 bopd  "in 1936 which will be 10000 bopd to-day"! What is going on here? Although the best contingent resource estimate for Chia Surkh is 120.8 million barrels (still less than original estimate), this includes condensate and gas in the Shiranish. Without a market for gas in Kurdistan, these BOEs will be in the ground for a long time.

It has been repeated too many times that Chia Surkh is an economic field. Genel Enerji says "well 7 was first well to confirm the presence of commercial quantities of oil and gas". This is a strange way to state this? I think they are only saying that this well has a test at a rate which should be economic? For more serious readers, check the Middle East Economic Survey (MEES Vol LI No 12 March 24 2008), which says the Chia Surkh field is "semi-economic". I would think that 60 million barrels in Kurdistan, burdened with a big royalty is indeed semi-economic.

The new seismic has identified other prospects/leads which have been assigned prospective resources, with best case at 217.8 million barrels. LFD has not included the chance of success for these prospects. Initially, we were talking about billions of barrels and now it is millions for the best case.

So kudos to management for the positive spin on this. I think there are a lot of unanswered questions.
Comment by oilkid on Feb 09, 2011 2:40pm
I have too agree with you HHdoc. I was hoping for big numbers on this project and after reading this NR I'm very disappointed. Would be better  for LFD to maybe ventured over to the prospective zones and see what awaits them? sounds like that area could be worth while. So LFD puts 10,000 bbl on line by early next year this could be around $ 12 depending the price of oil? Any thoughts ...more  
Comment by Baxter4 on Feb 09, 2011 3:02pm
So LFD puts 10,000 bbl on line by early next year this could be around $ 12 depending the price of oil?Too high. Way to many outstanding shares fully diluted. Assuming the warrents are exercised so no additional dilution is required, I see $3 next year as being the high end target.
Comment by massEntropy on Feb 09, 2011 3:08pm
$1 SP would be spectacular!
Comment by good40 on Feb 09, 2011 7:09pm
Positive spin is right HHdoc. Anytime a company spends money for a Prospective resource report, it's for positive spin. Prospective resource is undiscovered potential. Imagine advertizing something that is undiscovered, it's almost unbelievable. Contingent resource is non-commercial. The following link explains everything... it disproves all the pumpers... but in truth, the link ...more  
Comment by Baxter4 on Feb 09, 2011 8:54pm
GoofyFunny you had a link in your post that actually showed you were misleading in your post. Below is the actual definition from the Alberta Securities Commission. It does not say Contingent Resources are non commercial. It says the chance of commerciality is equal to the chance of development. In other words, develop the infrastructure and the well becomes commercial. That is Longfords plan if ...more  
Comment by HHdoc on Feb 09, 2011 9:07pm
Sorry Baxter;It does say that contingent are "sub-commercial". Check out the chart on this website. Only "reserves" are commercial!
Comment by abirdofprey on Feb 09, 2011 9:11pm
OOOOH SNAP, goofy is taken out to the wood shed again and biatch slapped by Baxter.Goofy, you must work for FOX. They often are caught manipulating and editing data to suit their purposes.YOU ARE SLIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment by Baxter4 on Feb 09, 2011 10:14pm
Take a better look at the chart good40, I mean HHdoc. Below contingent reserves ar unrecoverable. Sub-commercial is just a way of saying infrastructure is not in place. Sort of like the Beaufort Sea, until the MacKenzie pipeline is built those vast gas reserves are contingent. Wonder why Imperial is thinking of spending $15 billion if they think their reserves are not commercial?