Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Longford Energy Inc V.LFD

TSXV:LFD - Post Discussion

Longford Energy Inc > 5000/day discovered at least already= $5 stock now
View:
Post by maysteeler23 on Mar 16, 2011 11:34pm

5000/day discovered at least already= $5 stock now

And let's nit forget crude is still near $100. A price no one expected. And Brent is $110, which is more tied to LFD
Comment by good40 on Mar 17, 2011 10:48am
The 1936 well which was reported as initially producing 4800 bopd was determined to be non-commercial becausethe oil column was too small.  If the oil column was too small then to sustain production,  it is too small todayas well.  Don't forget,  the C7 producer was appraised by two more wells,  C8 and C9.  Empty.
Comment by richkat on Mar 17, 2011 12:28pm
what is your angle good40 or should I say bad40:  you have never said one positive thing but you keep posting for what  ever reason.  Please respond.  Maybe time for you to be ignored by even more people then you are now.
Comment by Baxter4 on Mar 17, 2011 12:32pm
In 1936 4800 bbl/d was non-commercial as oil sold for around $1 a barrel, equivalent to $17/bbl in todays money. In fact, oil did not go higher than this price in todays money until 1973 by which time the Ba'ath party had nationalized the oil industry and favouring Sunni muslims in the country. So would 4800 bbl/d be commercial today if oil traded at $17/bbl? Not a chance. Is it commercial ...more  
Comment by jlmans1 on Mar 17, 2011 12:43pm
i have asked Good40 the same questions many times - he will never answer you, dont waste your timeThe only good thing about asking him is that you might educate other people to ignore him and his false posts. He is a paid basher , so your reply to him just made him money - thats the bottom lineHe really posts what he is fed to post and prays people read his posts and reply, ie. more money for ...more  
Comment by justin_a_lyesse on Mar 17, 2011 1:40pm
It's the number of "reads" that counts for G40. See my post from last month: https://www.stockhouse.com/Bullboards/MessageDetail.aspx?s=LFD&t=LIST&m=29196792&l=0&pd=0&r=0 More reads = more money
Comment by good40 on Mar 17, 2011 7:40pm
Richkat,  have you ever refuted any posts by Maysteeler,  taxdemicco or EOIM ?  Give me an example in my poststhat are false.  Just one.  Your trouble is that you are insecure with your investment... can't handle the truth.One other thing... it's more than you,  not then you.  First grade stuff Richkat.
Comment by Baxter4 on Mar 17, 2011 9:03pm
Give me an example in my posts that are false.  Just one.  I only had to go back one post to find a post that was false, in other word, a lie.If the oil column was too small then to sustain production,  it is too small today as well.The test in 1936 was not commercial then as oil was only worth $17/bbl in todays money in a world where oil was abundant. There is nowhere saying the ...more