WOW, this management team is some sort of special. They really need to go now.
So let me get this straight. Last year, EVERY SINGLE MOTION including directors was REJECTED by unitholders. What did they do? They said to unitholders, these are the best possible candidates for this position, even though they have ALL held the very same positions for over two decades (or since April 23, 2002).
Then this is directly below the sames for those who are being put forward:
Majority Voting Policy
The Board has adopted a majority voting policy pursuant to which, with respect to uncontested Board elections, each nominee who receives more votes withheld than are voted in favour of him or her, will be expected to forthwith submit his or her resignation to the Board, to be effective on its acceptance by the Board. The Board will refer the resignation to the Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee for consideration. The Board will promptly accept the resignation unless the Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee recommends to the Board that there are circumstances warranting that such Trustee continue to serve as a Trustee. In any event, it is expected that the resignation will be accepted (or rejected) by the Board within 90 days of the meeting of Unitholders, during which time an alternate Trustee may be appointed.
What NEEDS to happen this time for the vote on June 27th, 2023 is that ALL proposals be DEFEATED by an even larger majority from last year.
Maybe they will GET THE MESSAGE THIS TIME.