Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Lite Access Technologies Inc V.LTE

Lite Access Technologies Inc. provides fiber optic products and advanced installation methodologies. The Company offers integrated solutions for all types of telecom requirements. Beginning with a comprehensive project analysis to engineering, design and permitting, it offers a full complement of aerial and underground construction methodologies, including splicing, testing and maintenance. The... see more

TSXV:LTE - Post Discussion

Lite Access Technologies Inc > Stockview = Norwood
View:
Post by mirdad22 on Sep 18, 2020 10:26am

Stockview = Norwood

Interesting that this person just signed up on September 12 and had their first and only comment yesterday.

Same blabbering nonsense by both names.

You don't need to be a good detective to know they are both one and the same.  

Must be a disgruntled employee that Carlo fired when he took over or a past investor who got burned by the previous regime.

This is an entirely different company that has turned the corner in a big way.

Anyway to block this person?

Comment by Ventor12 on Sep 18, 2020 11:54am
I own the company but he's right though... The directors have 0 skin in the game and sells their options at any given opportunity. Most of them are here to collect their $25.000 retaining salary and sell options. Would rather see the options go to the subcontractors tbh. The less than 1% insider ownership is bothering me, Toyoda and Nanson should be voted out. But as long as they continue to ...more  
Comment by mirdad22 on Sep 18, 2020 12:22pm
Your are. right about Nanson but you're wrong about Carlo.  He owns lots of shares many with his own money.  
Comment by Ventor12 on Sep 18, 2020 12:54pm
Yes he owns a fair bit, but I wish everybody had the similar ownership as Carlo. The insider ownership is still very low. You have to take into account that he earned $453,000 in 2019, and have 1.5 million options. Those shares isn't a lot if you take into account everything the company is providing him with, but still better than nothing since it's his decision if he want to buy. 
Comment by Norwood66 on Sep 21, 2020 6:29pm
What are you talking about... I have been on this board for at least 5 years and have been consistent in my critique of this company waiting for change - this is long before Carlo. I made money on LTE on the way up but was confident that it was fleeting... which is it was/is. I don't know what stockview is so someone must have signed up to mimic ... I don't know or care. If you choose ...more  
Comment by Plus50 on Sep 22, 2020 10:24am
I remember you commenting about lte years ago. It appears you were right back then. Now im not sure. Your comment about censure and Trump is illinformed though. Guess you get all your news from CTV and CNN. 5 networks in the US along with twitter and facebook bash Trump 24/7 and one network supports him. I try to listen to all sides to make a decision not just one. I read all your posts on lte ...more  
Comment by Norwood66 on Sep 23, 2020 1:12pm
My point about the poster is that they wanted to censor or trash me because I am providing an opinion that doesn't mesh with theirs. Not cool...
Comment by mirdad22 on Sep 23, 2020 3:12pm
Opionions are welcome but I have a disdain for opionions with NO facts.  The only facts you stated were based upon the past.  The company is run vastly different than when you threw your money into it years ago. Show some REAL due diligence and you'll gain my respect.   For now you and stockview are one and the same......blah blah blah, no facts no due diligence.
Comment by Norwood66 on Sep 24, 2020 1:25pm
I am no insider nor do I follow them on a day-to-day basis. My thesis is that they are in a good macro trend but they are basically a construction company (some tried to argue that they have IP and a product company). This HAS NOT changed. They need to do a lot of volume of business even to make a net profit. The business model is flawed and they will always be chasing big projects only to make a ...more