Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Maritime Resources Corp V.MAE

Alternate Symbol(s):  MRTMF

Maritime Resources Corp. is a Canada-based gold exploration and development company focused on advancing the Hammerdown Gold Project in the Baie Verte District of Newfoundland and Labrador. The Company holds a 100% interest directly and subject to option agreements entitling it to earn 100% ownership in the Green Bay Property which includes the former Hammerdown gold mine and the Orion gold... see more

TSXV:MAE - Post Discussion

Maritime Resources Corp > How Much SGNL Should Pay For Your Shares?
View:
Post by DoumDiDoum on Aug 08, 2022 10:51am

How Much SGNL Should Pay For Your Shares?

It's quiet in here... nobody wants to comment on a merger between MAE and SGNL?  OK, let's try a more sensible subject then to fire the "debate": how much should SGNL pay. Let's start with a 40% premium on the 9 cents average SP from the last 6 months. It means 13 cents per share for a total offer of $62M for the company.   Will this be a good offer?
 
On the first offer, in July 2018, ANX offered MAE shareholders 21 cents a share and the share count was about 100M at that time. It was a global offer of about $21M, all in shares, for a premium of 108% at that time. We know the story, MAE shares have been diluted by 400% since then so if we remove the dilution factor, it means that if the same offer would be done right now, it would be about 5 cents (the current SP).  ANX offered at that time about $20 an ounce of gold  for 1M oz with about 600K in M+I and 400K inferred.  Gold was around $1200/oz.  Both companies changed their management since the fist hostile bid. 
 
Now, 3 years later, MAE bought the Nugget Pond gold circuit and is nearer to a production decision but did not increase the resource.  Gold is about $600/oz more. Like I said, shareholders have been diluted to death.  On SGNL’s side, the resource increased more than 2.5 times to 3M oz, they have a go ahead to develop Goldboro and management proved that they know what they are doing (now that the issues at Point-Rousse are fixed).  I would say that MAE’s situation did not improve that much compare to SGNL so I would say that SGNL has an advantage in the next round of negotiation.  
 
MAE’s management and shareholders must evaluate how much an ounce of gold in the ground is worth for SGNL to get the maximum value for Hammerdown and Orion which have about 1M ounces.  Some people (you can look at https://munknee.com/how-to-value-a-junior-miners-gold-in-the-ground/ ) did some research about how we much assess the value of gold in the ground and the conclusion is that 20$/oz for Inferred, 30$ for M+I and 160$ for P&P (Proven and probable = gold reserve).  So if we take right now the 520K in M+I and 460K Inferred, it means that $15.6M + $9.2M = $25M should be a fair valuation for MAE’S gold.  It’s not far from the current market cap!  
 
IMO MAE is not in the driver seat right now.  After the FS is published, perhaps they will be able to get more if the resource in the reserve category is interesting.  If we speculate based on the last PFS published, the P&P could be around 500K oz, meaning that the gold in the ground could be valued much more.  But I do not think it would reach the $160/oz as the mine life is only 9 years and a major will not be interested if the deposit does not have A LOT more ounces.  SGNL is the one that can afford paying a little extra for the ounces in the ground as Point-Rousse is already paid for, is near Hammerdown and is currently running with a competent trained work force, tailing facilities and all the permits in place.  So, they might be willing to pay $40 to $60 an ounce in the ground IMO, meaning 10 to 13 cents a share.  Their first offer will not be as high as 60$ an ounce though, they could start with 40$/oz for $40M or 10 cents a share.
 
So both the 40% premium and in-situ value method is giving about a maximum of 13 cents a share or about $60M for the company.  Are you willing to accept that?  If not what is your price?  All in ca$h, all in shares, a mix of the 2?
Comment by GrumpyInvestor on Aug 08, 2022 11:56am
Hi DoumDiDoum, I don't see why Signal Gold would be tempted to acquire MAE at the price you are suggesting at this moment. They have no cash, and they will need to do a major financing to build their mine, around 60% dept and 40% shares. Right now, if they gave SGNL shares in exchange to buy out MAE for $60M, they would be "giving away" more than 33% of the company ! I think SGNL ...more  
Comment by DoumDiDoum on Aug 08, 2022 3:47pm
Thanks for your input Grumpy But don't you think securing 70k ounces/year at Point-Rousse for SGNL and expediting Hammerdown in production benefiting from the "soon to be" gold bubble that might happen in the coming months is a win-win for both companies?  It's unlocking Hammerdown value right away and allows for the newly merged company to explore the other promising ...more  
Comment by GrumpyInvestor on Aug 08, 2022 6:22pm
I totally agree that Signal gold should explore the possibilities of growing their operations in NFLD, but only AFTER they are well established in Goldboro and can use its (hopefully) high value and share price to make acquisitions with very little dilution. If MAE has developped too much by then, there should still be a lot of interesting cheap targets at that time. No matter how undervalued ...more  
Comment by DoumDiDoum on Aug 08, 2022 10:53pm
I got your point Grumpy, as a SGNL shareholder you do not want to give a crunch of Goldboro even if it means a boost to both companies right now.  Are you also an MEA shareholder?  If so, it means you want both companies to play it alone then?
Comment by GrumpyInvestor on Aug 09, 2022 1:08pm
I once held some shares, but I finally sold last year, at about the same price I had bought, because I didn't see how the company could get to production on its own without massive dilution. When ANX made their offer, I felt it was a good match, because both companies were in similar spots. But now, I feel SGNL has advanced greatly towards production, while adding a lot of ounces with a good ...more  
Comment by ggrellette on Aug 09, 2022 2:08pm
SGNL could be bought out by LAB.
Comment by GrumpyInvestor on Aug 09, 2022 5:20pm
?!?!? I assume you meant to say MAE could be bought out by LAB ?
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities