Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Mountain Lake Resources Inc V.MOA

TSXV:MOA - Post Discussion

View:
Post by TheRock07 on Sep 19, 2010 3:52pm

RIC ?

Its moving  its share price upwards , while also reporting all of MOA's news releases.

It has a strong  history  as a gold producer in this Province, and needs to restore its growth premium.
Soon, it will have lost its initial 70 % WI in VL thru earn-ins  by  NewCo and MOA.

In retro, was this a big mistake by RIC management ?
Will they try to reclaim VL by making a TO offer for MOA's share , using equity as the currency ?

Is MOA being knee capped at
.80 for this reason  or is this just aggressive profit-taking ?
Comment by JR5 on Sep 19, 2010 5:41pm
I agree that a temporary lid has been put on the price of MOA. I was buying on the day that 81 cents was taken out and then the wall was put in place. RIC already has a large chunk of the company so a deal with shares of RIC makes sense. All three companies could be put together and RIC would be the cash driving force to keep drilling. The question is would MOA spin off a couple of properties ...more  
Comment by dcully on Sep 19, 2010 7:26pm
Don't mistake Ric as a driving force. They were lead on the Valentine property for 8 - 10 years.... They got off to a good start with a couple of drill programs  when MOA partnered up with them that resulted in the initial 43-101. Then they fell asleep at the switch and nothing happened with the property. I was really pleased when moa management snagged the property back and proceeded ...more  
Comment by JR5 on Sep 19, 2010 10:18pm
I'd be interested too, even more if they spun off two new companies-one for Little River and the other for Glover. Would expect at least a 50% premium in Ric paper, some cash and a share in the spin offs. Now for some more positive drill results and just maybe they won't be able to hold MOA back!Cheers,JR. 
Comment by TheRock07 on Sep 20, 2010 6:31am
I cannot see RIC doing a pure  TO on MOA.It would not get shareholder aproval to do so , unless the offer were very much at a premium.What I foresee is RIC acquiring our 50 % of VL  for some cash but mostly equity ,while MOA  retains its  other properties with the necessary cash to move them quickly thru the definitive exploration stages.This route means that, thru our RIC ...more  
Comment by Cousin_Gert on Sep 20, 2010 8:56am
Personally I see about a 0% chance of RIC trying to buy back MOA's 50%. This is a major MOA asset and MOA shareholders would have to vote to accept any offer. At this point I would expect MOA's management to say "Go Away; not interested" as whatever they offered would, at this point, be far below the blue sky potential now being presented to the shareholders of MOA. I see MOA ...more  
Comment by TheRock07 on Sep 20, 2010 9:53am
Very reasonable  arguments CG.However, companies that continue to drill up a resource over extended periods of  time are valued far less than those that drill out an initial economic resource and  use the resulting cash flows to expand both production and mine life.Further, they are at risk of significant dilution and also risk missing the boat should the POG lose steam over the ...more  
Comment by Cousin_Gert on Sep 20, 2010 10:28am
Yes R7...I also agree that the little guy does well by passing along an economic resource to a bigger fish at the right time, however it has begun to appear to me that this should not be done too soon with the way the geology here is shaping up. For example Valentine East(at km 13) has shown enough data from past drilling; especially when you can see how quickly Leprechaun Pond has ...more