Mountain Lake Resources Inc V.MOA

RE 43-101 BLINDSIDED

[u4eah]

VRM or OREVAST22
-Fairly new to this board
-Could you elaborate more on what precisely happened, and if this was the catalyst for poor share performance and anemic volumes ?
-Thanks,  u4eah

[VRM]

Most MOA SH were stunned when the DEC 16 2010 new 43-101 was realesed without any mention of the January 12 2005 43-101. Most expected that the drilling conducted in 2010 would add to the 359,000 oz inferred resource and that the 359,000 oz would greatly increase by using a 1 or 2 g/t minimum cutoff. A new 43-101 indicating a resource of 1 million oz plus or minus had been

[theflusher]

Where is that geologist now, was the old numbersmisrepresented and MOZ are taking the smart approach and not take any previous work as gospel.

[VRM]

Spoken like a real MOZ supporter. If the 2005 43-101 that was held out to be the strong indicator of what VL has for mineable resource is to be discounted as having no value and the expertise and worth of the geologist that submitted it brought into question., my question would be why should anyone pay any more attention to the 2011 43-101 and the geologist that submitted it.The point being