Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum North American Gem Inc V.NAG

TSXV:NAG - Post Discussion

North American Gem Inc > From what I read
View:
Post by likeslt on Sep 10, 2009 9:23pm

From what I read

NAG had agreement with Alan for leasing coal property from Alan. The land has coal seam on average 91cm only. NAG agreed to pay Bob for mining and loading coal on the truck on a charge of $40/ton. NAG found Charles who was willing to buy the coal at the price of $58/ton, $8-$10 higher than the market price. (just using common names for easy communications)

There is no clear information from this release:

1.       What are NAG’s obligations to Alan for this agreement?  How much should NAG pay to get the coal lease.  

2.       What is the relationship between Alan & Bob?

3.       will “silly” Charles still buy the coal in Oct or later $8-$10/ton more than market fair price?

4.       I think Bob won’t eat the transportation cost, does NAG have to pay the transportation cost to the truck company?

5.       Will NAG send or hire site manager and clerks to run the coal mine? what is the overhead cost? How much has NAG already spent for advertising everywhere?

Think of above questions and make your own judgments if NAG has a good deal.

Comment by sambrown21 on Sep 10, 2009 10:25pm
We could refer to the shareholders common names as Ted and Alice instead of Anonymous and those who get screwed.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse