Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum North American Gem Inc V.NAG

TSXV:NAG - Post Discussion

North American Gem Inc > EVERYONES BAFFLED:
View:
Post by Bluegene66 on Jul 29, 2010 12:55pm

EVERYONES BAFFLED:

hey V2, you just described the venture exchange. SLT crashed along with most others because of the uranium fallout (no pun intended). Examples-UEX $9.00 to
.70. STM-$3.75 to
.25. JNN-$3.50 to
.14. SLT is in the process of negotiating a operating mining permit currently producing metallurgical coal in Kentucky. My thoughts are SLT will be producing more coal than NAG short term, they will fast track this project using there past experiences. Is this fair? absolutely not, NAG should be first in line.
Comment by SUCYN on Jul 29, 2010 1:13pm
That's one reason that I own 130,000 shares of SLT with an average cost of 0.0575....Also the surface results are back from the lab, and the lab must have leaked out that the copper and gold numbers were very good....Maybe that's why an investor bought a bunch a week or so back...I'm hoping that SLT will put out the results within the next few weeks...SP could double when released ...more  
Comment by Saturn4 on Jul 29, 2010 2:26pm
Baffled, indeed ... by-the-way, Durkastan, I appreciate your comments but I think you are being very conservative with your projected s/p targets.  With both mine #2 and #3 producing at full capacity (by that, I mean 8-10 K for #2 and 25K for #3 -- although that can be added to later) IMO we should be closer to the .50 mark in s/p.  As the other mines start getting operational the s/p ...more  
Comment by Saturn4 on Jul 29, 2010 4:57pm
LOL, Z06 --- I didn't think I had a rep :)  But in any event, yes, I do believe the mine was profitable.  The first few months were bad because of the weather, but after those problems subsided I believe mine #1 actually made money.  As NAG has said, it was a learning experience.  How much money?  I have not clue but in time we will all know.
Comment by in2itiv on Jul 29, 2010 6:55pm
I also had a conversation with an individual that mentioned it was profitable.
Comment by Durkastan on Jul 30, 2010 9:25am
I think blue gem is going for around $150 now (likely more) ... let's say they profit $100 per ton (which is very likely if their costs remain let's say $50 per ton to mine) ... 100 X 30,000 = 3,000, 000 a month X 12 = 36 million profit just on one mine alone!!  At 10X net earning divided by 180,000,000 shares = $2.00 per share!!  That's just from 1 mine!!  That's my ...more  
Comment by mactiger on Jul 30, 2010 10:11am
Wow! Those were pretty impressive mental excersises by you and Saturn. As the valuations you came up with... The only thing to add is that it looks more like pure accounting. Two more factors that will be in play are future growth potential (i.e. the embedded option of having mine #4, #5, etc starting production over the next few years) and the sentiment.
Comment by goldengirl20 on Jul 30, 2010 10:15am
Alos the biggest part of the whole equation being a penny stock is the PROMO JOB done , these companies are a dime a dozen still need to make the world aware of the good ones, so lets concentrate on this gem Charles and put your others on the bcakburner.
Comment by mactiger on Jul 30, 2010 10:28am
Agree goldengirl, though promo is not a factor in valuation, but rather a means of influencing sentiment and enhancing the SP.
Comment by Durkastan on Jul 30, 2010 10:51am
As the valuations you came up with... The only thing to add is that it looks more like pure accounting. Two more factors that will be in play are future growth potential (i.e. the embedded option of having mine #4, #5, etc starting production over the next few years) and the sentiment. With all due respect... they are not pure accounting. :) This is how company valuation is done. In fact, the ...more  
Comment by mactiger on Jul 30, 2010 11:18am
If the mines #4, #5, and so on were 'guaranteed' as you said, there would cease to be any embedded option at all. :))))Beacuse the market would, with varying degree of precision, incorporate those facts into current valuation. Whether or not the SP will reflect that would depend on sentiment. And the SP for me is more important than book values or some 'calculated worth'.The ...more  
Comment by Saturn4 on Jul 30, 2010 1:05pm
I'd be happy with your valuation too, Durkastan.  Of course, everything is just pie in the sky right now ... what the market does, the market does ... if enough interest is generated be may be s/p much higher (or lower if markets decline as in 2008) ... I remember GXS going from .18 to $20 ... now is less than a buck!!  Only time will tell ....Let's see how many actual mines NAG ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities