Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum North American Gem Inc V.NAG

TSXV:NAG - Post Discussion

North American Gem Inc > number 2 mine and new operator
View:
Post by nemo3 on Sep 28, 2011 4:04pm

number 2 mine and new operator

can they make profit there? who knows. if u look at last financials, coal rev was $86000 cost of coal sold was $94,000. gross loss from mining this coal was 417,000. But these mines are too small to do much with. they seem to be leftovers from someone else. Wages salaries and benefits was 476,000. great compensation for a company that makes no profit. I wonder if results were good in SK, if this would do anything for NAG? maybe if they hit 100m of coal in each of the 5 holes. if anything good is coming out of the holes, there is no indication of any leaks of good info.
Comment by shellfish1 on Sep 29, 2011 12:33am
very likely not.CCF.v, RDA.v, and NDX.v are some examples - larger operation scale with own production team.    Shellfish
Comment by SUCYN on Sep 29, 2011 9:00am
RDA now has a SP of 0.07 ( it was trading @ 0.06 a few days ago ) down from 0.36...are they making any money ???
Comment by shellfish1 on Sep 29, 2011 12:51pm
None of these new producers are makeing money. NAG will be doing the same. But it does not matter at all because the CEO is getting paid decently anyway. His business model is clear: register a puplic company and let it exists so that he can get paid all the way, plus such bonus as stock based compensation and cheaper options. You and me are taking risk to ...more  
Comment by cantour on Sep 29, 2011 1:39pm
Well said<<<
Comment by shellfish1 on Sep 29, 2011 5:02pm
Was hoping to take a ride in a bullish market, though knowing that it was not a gem.  In such a bearish market, where to go from here?  Shellfish   
Comment by actionplanner on Sep 30, 2011 11:01am
Shellfish, I agree totaly, and there are also 99% of the ceos' on the venture exchange that do the same. It seems they are not accountable to anyone for their self appointed salaries. There is the inner circle of friends at the top, and a ceo of one company is likely on 10 different company boards of directors... It is all top end robbery. How many times have we seen a jr. hype up their ...more  
Comment by Z06 on Sep 30, 2011 11:17am
I can't beleave any of you are still here. This company is a sham. Rumour? There's no rumour.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities