Post by
GGGsOldFriend on Jan 08, 2022 6:42pm
Regarding a buyout...
I don't favor a buyout that makes current investors a very nice profit at the expense of giving away substantial value for free. This is especially the case where, as here, I believe the price of gold, and, by extension, the value of gold in the ground, will increase substantially in the next 1 to 5 years. In short, I think we have the asset most likely to be in demand in a rising/sellers market. I'm in no hurry to sell an asset which I'm fairly convinced will be rising in value over the short to medium term, and that's without even factoring in the likelihood the resource will grow very substantially.
Comment by
hockeyplusgold on Jan 08, 2022 7:00pm
When there is. A deal I would think it would be at multiples of where the stock is now 1/3 to 1/2 most likely in cash balance in shares of the purchaser possibly even shares of a royalty company on top of that that is part of the deal either way our unlocked value will be multiples of where the stock is today
Comment by
JRafflesUK on Jan 09, 2022 6:25pm
hockeyplusgold - possibly even shares of a royalty company on top In the event of an early sale, this would future proof NFG shareholders with a return on future gold finds on their district scale property.
Comment by
DanWarren on Jan 09, 2022 7:38pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
DanWarren on Jan 09, 2022 7:43pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
hockeyplusgold on Jan 09, 2022 9:37pm
Iam seeing 20 to 30 C$ this year without a buyout
Comment by
itsjustme1 on Jan 10, 2022 12:21am
If you're going to dream, dream big
Comment by
DanWarren on Jan 10, 2022 12:37am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
DanWarren on Jan 10, 2022 10:20am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
DanWarren on Jan 10, 2022 10:24am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
likeike on Jan 10, 2022 10:46am
Dan your hitting on the magic production. Fosterville produce at 600,000 oz per year was it the first 5 years and is still producing at 500,000 oz per year. We are so much bigger than Fosterville and by the time we are producing that old comparison will appear to be laughable. There remains such a lack of imagination as to what we have stumbled upon. IKE
Comment by
likeike on Jan 10, 2022 11:11am
Let me put it this way to say NFG or whoever partially owns it will become more than just a cash cow......too small......cash elephant ......too small.......Godzilla....YES. We will become a cash Godzilla and QH will become more of a genius and his Godzilla sign will become worth a million as memorybilia.... Unchartered waters because we cannot think that big. IKE
Comment by
turugby on Jan 10, 2022 12:29pm
the talk here sounds alot like what we heard at gbr - estimates 49 plus - fully funded for2022 - next hemlo etc. - sell to kinross , who cant afford it without help - property in Russia and Africa , inspires confidence - I hold gbr and nfg - could nfg get sold out like gbr - I made money , but feel like I got stabbed in the back
Comment by
Gangsterme on Jan 10, 2022 2:08pm
All this talk that GBR was worth so much more......if so why did KINROSS stock take such a big hit and still be down significantly from before announcing buyout. Seems to me their shareholders not convinced it was such a great buyout price. If convinced they got a great steal then their stock would be a great buy. Where is this reasoning wrong?
Comment by
megacopper on Jan 10, 2022 3:18pm
In almost all buyouts the acquiring company's share price will drop when the announcement is first made public. This is a well known phenomenon. The acquiring company has to issue shares and usually incur debt to make the purchase which is often regarded as a negative initially by shareholders of the acquiring company.
Comment by
Gangsterme on Jan 10, 2022 3:25pm
You are correct, often the purchasing stock drops, however the reason is because they most often pay a premium for the stock they are buying, are you suggesting that this happened to Kinross? Issuing share to purchases an undervalued stock should not cause a drop in value, only if the shareholders thought they overpaid. Where is my logic wrong?
Comment by
DanWarren on Jan 10, 2022 1:03am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
DanWarren on Jan 10, 2022 1:09am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy