RE:Take another look at NFGC 21-182 and NFGC 20-59

If you are referring to Snowline, Snowline will have a mountain of low grade Gold ore versus NFG's patch of high grade gold ore.  Grade can be king but so can be tonnage.  The biggest, most profitable mines in the world or all low grade, high tonnage porphyry deposits.

FYI:  Strike length is ore between holes.  True width is 70% to 80% of the reported intervals.

Retiredgeo I have you on ignore but an acquantance from NFG Moonshot Associates said

I should respond as you are just being plain silly now.

Assuming you really were a geo and knowing that porphyr mines are just highly sought

after should know the vast majority are incredible low grade but the big one after years

of mining they finally get to the paydirt. What I am alluding too is the vast investment

in infrastructure that most require. Standard one I often refer to is the KSM project that

has 60 mill (claimed) of gold but requires (as of 20 years ago) over 5 billion to just get

to the ore by having to drill through a mountain. The payback before you become 

profitalble I do not even want to contemplate. Payback is long in most of these low

grade projects so lets just stick to this one point.

We will have cost of below $200 on production and I guarentee the payback will 

probably be a year or two if they go for a big mine.

In my mind you give retired a bad name and surely would not call myself 

retired pharmacist I think I can still count more effectively. 

You have been called out often to do a calculation of certain bodies of ore.

Why not do it or stop calling yourself a geo.

Rescind Retired and Geo from your name for honesty's sake ...it is so misleading IKE