Your quote 1Student Should you or anybody else want a steadily much higher priced critical minerals, (specifically graphite materials), pricing regime, what is needed would be a massive wave of consolidation servicing an intent to successfully corner the Canadian graphite market; and that would likely only require much less than a couple of billion dollars worth of investment placed toward consolidating the entire graphite bearing lands development playing field within Canada My reply ? Anovion and Forge Nano to mass produce synthetic graphite anode material in the US Nouveau Monde
Graphite Acquires
Mason Resources'
Lac Guret Graphite ... Forge Nano's advanced coating technologies NOU -
Forge Nano LLG -
Forge Nano GRAT - is teamed with
Forge Nano LMR - US DoD 5 yr contract work on sphering or more like 5 yr drag and --->
Forge Nano ?
VOLT aus - ( africa / ukraine graphite ) mentioned Anovion in press.
GLK - Remember Great Lakes Graphite - Changed name to, Novo Graphite ?
Back then, apparently the name
Forge Nano name was circulating...
https://stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/glkif/great-lakes-graphite-inc?threadid=29287134 https://stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/glkif/great-lakes-graphite-inc?postid=29287548 You see Sudent1, There's a difference of consolodating graphite juniors inside of Canada versus
another country consolodating Canadian graphite junior's inside their country.
Recognizing ( In situ ) valuations allows a measure of protection for junior and sm shareholders.
If no in situ values are recognized, valuations drop ----> others step in as savior
to junior.... is it really an act of saving, if valuations still remain extremely discounted ?
LMR classic end outcome. Consolodate shares destroys sm investor value.
Post consolodation, stock continues to slide.
Funding entity choosing Cdn project with cottage resistence vs project with no resistence.
Contract over 5 yrs ( sphering ? ) when Forge Nano already perfected tech ?
Recognize junior CM in situ values thwarts preditory entities of, consolodating CM
resources at scale, benefiting another country.
If by chance you're implying there is a consolo in play, silent, inactive junior's...
Then... what if in situ values were recognized would it not command better buyouts ?
Secondly, US election year ?
Trump is no fan of, EV's which would devastate the CM industry as a whole.
Suppose there were a mass buying spree of, CDN CM projects by, US...
Should this not take place prior to US elections ?
Not seeing this occur and only seeing fancy chess moves that benefit US instead of
Canada is.... taking potential wealth from junior and sm investor.
$0.10 cent valuation -------> what would be offered ?
vs
$0.70 cent in situ valuation -------> purchaser would have to offer far more $$$$.,
Cheers....