Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Naturally Splendid Enterprises Ltd V.NSP.H

Alternate Symbol(s):  NSPDF

Naturally Splendid Enterprises Ltd. is a Canada-based company, which develops and distributes healthy lifestyle foods and products. The Company owns Prosnack Natural Foods Inc. (Prosnack Natural Foods), a food manufacturing facility. Prosnack Natural Foods focusses on nutritional bars, Chii Naturally Pure Hemp, which is a retail line of hemp food products, while Pawsitive FX is a line of all... see more

TSXV:NSP.H - Post Discussion

Naturally Splendid Enterprises Ltd > #1NSP poster Divot doesn't own NSP, clueless
View:
Post by bagcheese on Feb 20, 2022 8:28am

#1NSP poster Divot doesn't own NSP, clueless

Google and online calculators to do the most simple, basic math? You still don’t grasp that a stock’s share price can go down thousands of percent fold from one price to another? I guess I did predict you wouldn’t be able to.

I’ve never had to report a loss on my tax return, however judging by the member whom posted your stock buy picks history, you’ve had to report nothing but massive losses. The member and I have no idea how much your book value of the securities were that you lost on those horrendous stock buy picks.. he did clearly display where you prompted people to buy and where those stock prices are today and those stock prices are indeed many hundreds of percent at best in share price decline from where you prompted people to buy.

You also seem to be confused by the term percentile which is also hilarious. Google it.

Lets try it this way and I will make it really easy and simple for you with nice round numbers;

Q: if you buy a stock at a share price of $100 and the share price drops to .01 cents ..what is the percentile decline in the share price?

Not the percent of money lost or percentage of initial investment. We aren’t talking dollars or percent loss of investment as I nor the other member know how many dollars or the book value loss you claimed on the securities, we are talking about the percentile (%) decline in the share price from $100 to $.01 Simple.

Q: What is the percentile decline in the share price divot111?


I truly hope you say something like 99.99%, please I’m hopping so hard you do.

You are trying to avoid answering as your stock picks get folded many multiples, which you strangely confirmed. Many multiple means hundrends and thousands of percentile  (%) from the original share price to its current share price. 

We are talking about how horrible your stock picks are in terms of where you picked them and how badly they got folded as the member pointed out and as you not only didn’t refute, you acknowledged and accepted him as being accurate.

The best of those horrible stock picks by you displayed many hundreds of percentiles drop in share price from where you picked them to where those share prices sit today and given that’s fact why should we listen to you combined with the fact you don’t even own shares in NSP and are the number #1 poster on the NSP Bullboard everyday… for months now…. you're essentally convoluting the NSP board with junk that's literally childish and has negative value to anyone including yourself. 

To describe and display how badly your stock picks are it's not accurate enough to say you lost 99.99% of your investment or 100% of your investment, you have such horrible enteries in these securities, we are more acurate to show how much of a decline in share price from where you purhase shares to where the share price currently sits, which is many multiples lower and is expressed and can be expressed beyond 100%, yet you cannot grasp this.

If you bought Berkshire Hathaway for 475,000 a share and it declined to 1 cent, does it give a better picture of the stock pick to say you lost nearly 100% or is it more accurate of a picture to show that your share price entry to decline was so off that it declined over 10 million percentile... the later gives a more accurate picture of how horrible this entry point was with where the stock price currently resides.. your stock entries are as well so horrible that they must be described more accurately using the later to display. you arent loosing 20 and 30% on an investment, your picked drop many multiples from their initial investment entries. Literally you get f;n folded like a betch on your picks that they cant be accurately depicted from 1%-100% you get right greased on your picks.

Here is the math question for you so you don’t try to avoid the question and answering it, might want to call up your grade 3 math teacher whom should have failed you:

Q: If you buy a stock at a share price of $100 and the share price drops to .01 cents ..what is the percentile (%) decline in the share price?

I’ll check back tonight when I need a laugh.
Comment by divot111 on Feb 21, 2022 3:26pm
Lol. The length of your post full of insults and deflection still doesn't make it real. I will continue to wait for the Google LINK supporting what you have made up in your head. The other poster you keep referencing and praising for disecting my stock picks used actual math regarding decline in shareprice percentage/percentile and no I don't dispute his math, why would I? I respect him ...more  
Comment by divot111 on Feb 21, 2022 3:40pm
Let's see if Wikipedia is as stupid as google regarding math. Please show me where in the description it verifies your complete utter nonsense. There a several examples and formulas to reference. I will happily give you credit if you can show me the proof of your complete utter nonsense.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentile 
Comment by bagcheese on Feb 21, 2022 4:55pm
I literally made that long post because you are absolutely clueless and it would be funny if you weren’t literally serious in not understanding basic math. Here is an example that you absolutely won’t understand, however I will attempt to force it into your completely and hilariously clueless mind; If you purchase a security at $1 and it goes to 1000, you would calculate your gain as a 99900 ...more  
Comment by divot111 on Feb 21, 2022 5:36pm
All them words and still NOTHING to prove your THEORY. No link, no nothing. I am starting to believe you CAN NOT back up your silly theory. I will continue to wait for your PROOF. Theory is not proof. I understand completely what you are trying to say but you sir are wrong and until you can post a thousand words with at least one or two words of proof it will remain that way. Deflection and ...more  
Comment by bagcheese on Feb 21, 2022 6:04pm
Words? You requested the math, I provided it and laid it out very clear, slow and simple.. “theory”? It’s basic mathematics not “theory” .. what “theory” are you referring to? Division? Decimals? Percentage? these aren't theory..are these “theory” to you? Hahahahaha I laid it out as clear as can be, ..what do you want a link to? What specifically do you want a “link” to? Division ...more  
Comment by divot111 on Feb 21, 2022 7:09pm
Still no LINK to anyone saying the same thing you are making up? Odd eh? And yet it is me who can't comprehend something that there is no factual data anywhere to justify. You claim there is data but won't share it. Weird. Hahahahahahaha! And now your mission is really to take out bashers and we should just move on. Proving I am a basher is a whole different argument that you will lose too ...more  
Comment by bagcheese on Feb 21, 2022 7:18pm
That point about the tooth fairy... I think you actually got me on the tooth fairy.. the tooth fairy adds a whole new dynamic to this lol
Comment by divot111 on Feb 21, 2022 7:20pm
Fact. Stocks can go up thousands of percent. Stocks can not lose more than 100%. Your percentile argument is nonsense. It can make sense to you but that doesn't make it real? Just ask my blurry friend Big Foot who Googled the definition of percentile for me after you said to do so. He speaks english too. Bet you didn't know that.
Comment by RetireAt55 on Feb 21, 2022 7:43pm
I do not agree with a lot of Divots post nor do I understand why he posts so much on this board to a stock he may not own. but he is 100% right here in this post. Whatever thing bagcheese is trying to debat, he is not using the term percentile in the incorrect way. Percentile is used in statistics as a way to compare one data point against a larger collection of data points, not in the way ...more  
Comment by RetireAt55 on Feb 21, 2022 7:52pm
Opps, bad wording on last post, wish there was a way to edit post. Whatever thing bagcheese is trying to debat, he is not using the term percentile in the correct way.
Comment by bagcheese on Feb 21, 2022 8:10pm
Now you’re putting words in my mouth to weasel out.. to accurately calculate how horrible of a stock picker you are you have to express the percentile past the decimal. I have never once spoken about the ability or not to lose more than you invest, I am talking about displaying how poorly you pick entries and saying you lost 99% or 99.9% isn’t even as accurate as it needs, you have to go multiple ...more  
Comment by divot111 on Feb 22, 2022 3:41pm
Hahahaha! Now you are going to play FAKE victim and make a bunch of other nonsense up? Why wouldn't you double down on make believe you dishonest dolt? The debate is about percentile and your ridiculously misleading made up use of the term. Just stop already numbnuts! You've been served and 'owned' / 'folded' as you like to say. You are just exposng yourself as the ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities