Naturally Splendid Enterprises Ltd V.NSP.H

Divot doesn't own NSP, #1 poster on NSP board

[bagcheese]

1. You and nor anyone provided numbers at all, no math ..nothing, I’ve literally asked for math every reply and you replied with none and never pointed at where I was incorrect using math.
2. I read your definition, however it did not in any way whatsoever refute my usage  as wrong whatsoever. You literally assisted my argument. You just posted a link and what? ...you know how to cut and paste?? wooooo

Here is the definition from google;
per·cen·tile
STATISTICS

1. each of the 100 equal groups into which a population can be divided according to the distribution of values of a particular variable.
   • each of the 99 intermediate values of a random variable that divide a frequency distribution into 100 groups. "the tenth percentile for weight"

That ‘tenth’ percentile is to the second decimal place to the right  when there is loss, to the left hwen there is gain and to the 'hundredth' percentile is to the third digit to the right of the decimal and would account for a wider sample group. That is not up for debate. You can't grasp this, and are angry., You got waxed and you post on a board you hold no shares in, youre a certified rockpile.
You cannot in any way prove the math wrong and your definition proved me correct

3. I laid the math and numbers out, they are still there, you offered no math, not numbers, nor any explanation of the math I displayed many times, many ways and you didn’t refer to any single part of it as wrong, you just scream ‘oh your math is wrong’ ..ok, where is it wrong? Still waiting….

4. For the 13^th time, I ask, being you own no shares in NSP, why are you the number #1 poster on the NSP board daily, monthly and yearly?? 

[divot111]

Holy fak. You know the nonsense you are making up does not support your argument that people can be down thousands of percentile on a stock. You should be a penny stock CEO. Most are huksters. What you keep lying about is literally impossible. Doesn't get anymore real than that. Nope, nobody has posted any numbers or math. Could you lie anymore? What a dishonest dolt

[bagcheese]

Why don’t you also apologize to the members of this board for clogging it up with for months with garbage..(yea, you lost money on NSP and are disgruntled, move on, you've lost money on all your investments). I will ask the same questions over and over and over, for instance now, for the fourteenth time, why, without owning NSP shares are you posting absolute garbage on this board day in and

[divot111]

You have been proven wrong with facts aka actual math and data yet the conman in you believes you should just keep spewing the same dishonest information that doesn't support your dishonest use of the term percentile. You are not going to belittle me into submission. No way for you to know whether I have lost or made money anywhere but hey present your lies as fact like all of your other made

[bagcheese]

Read your last post, NOTHING in your last post answers the question of why are you the #1 poster on the NSP board while owning no shares? Never once have I said you can lose more than 100% - you keep trying to take the debt there to deflect, in fact I'vr stated there can't be a loss of more than 100% but nice try. Post where I’ve said its possible to lose more than 100%. Right of the

[divot111]

Lol. You keep deflecting from the debate numbnuts. Try to stay on track. What you claimed is that one can be down thousands of percentile on a stock and that claim can't be verified because it is 100% not possible and the definition of percentile does in no way verify that one can be down thousands of percentile on any investment. Admit it you dishonest dolt. You ARE incorrect. You can change

[divot111]

Is this at .05 yet? I see .03. Next time this has a jump I suggest you all lock in your profits. Anyone who didn't at .05 likely wishes they had. Same advice for the next run if there is one. Good luck

[LongTheShorts]

This exchange over percentile. The person saying a larger drop in price to be accurately measured, yes you have to use digits past the decimal. It seems there’s agreement on that now. It’s also true that the first decimal is tenths of a percent in this case and the third is hundredth and so on, this is true. From what I’m reading there’s confusing on percentile. The person stating for example

[Notthatbright]

Who the F$$$k cares.....go read a book.

[divot111]

Haha! Read a book? He is clearly a writer of books. And does not understand the fairytale debate. It is all about the context of the argument. Not the math that does not and can not exist in the context of the argument. I wouldn't give a shiit either if I was you. Good luck to you. You are at least reasonable and don't have your eyes wide shut

[bagcheese]

Divot, you got waxed.. you and your Kirkland Lake grade 3 math diploma simply lost, you couldn’t comprehend and were essentially too folded to realize you have no argument, math, facts ..nothing. You got waxed so badly I feel sympathy for you.. why can’t you answer simple questions? Can’t you display any math and you’ve been so busy taking beatings for a week, you haven’t been able to bash NSP, a

[divot111]

Lol. You looked at DKM's real math and took that opportunity to try and insult me about my losses, which I have no issue, using a made up theory that I was down thousands of percentile on my picks which is literally impossible. I think you actually believed your mistake at first but when you got corrected with actual math you went on defence knowing full well you were wrong at the time as you

[bagcheese]

I'm just laughing at you ..esepcially when you say things like "NTB for making factual remarks." man, any credibility you might have had got flushd with that statement hahahaha ..and again you ignore answering questions that expose why you are really here.. you copy statements I've made about you eg. "you actually believe your own mistake" and now apparently it wasn'

[divot111]

Keep twisting the story conman. I would expect nothing less from a conman. You know exactly what I am talking about when I say DKM's math. He listed 3 of my many picks, of course picking the worst 3 to make his point which is just fine, and you took that info and made up a phony narrative about being down thousands of percentile on a stock to try and discredit me and it completely backfired

[bagcheese]

By all means like I have requested multiple times, repost whatever math you speak of... I've stated multiple times today for you to post any conflicting math and I would review ...............yet here I still wait. You're a zero substance blow hard. And for the 19th time, I ask, since you own no NSP stock, why are you posting on this wall?

[divot111]

Keep pretending numbnuts! Mine and DKM's math showed you the real math regarding percentage decline in a stock. What you made up regarding thousands of percentile losses in stocks is irrelevant because it is not real. I will keep posting the facts regarding this story while you continue your spin and insults. It is hard for some to admit they are wrong even when they know what they made up in

[bagcheese]

"Spin" ...Im literally requesting you repost something you seem certain exists ...how would that be spin exacty............ I've said I will review what you pu forward.. been saying it all day long I posted math all debate long which you never attempted to dispute its correctness ..I didn't view any math by you nor your little gobblin buddy NTB.. so for the 12th time, repost it

[divot111]

I know what you are doing conman. It is right out of the conman playbook. The correct math I continue to reference that you have seen with your own eyes multiple times is about percentage decline. You know, the reality you continue to pretend doesn't exist. What a dishonest peice of shiit you are. The math you want me to dipute as being incorrect can not be disputed in relation to your lie

[bagcheese]

A little more creative but not much better ...look at what this poster wrote and although there is no user names it is easy to tell who they are refering to and for the most part I would agree accurate ..the feeling i got from reading this is that I'm not the only one that thinks you can understand very basic stuff: This exchange over percentile. The person saying a larger drop in price to be

[divot111]

Math that is irrrelevant to ones' false claim is just that. Irrelevant! Why you continue to pretend you can't grasp reality is beyond me. A good conman continues the conman game even when the gig is up.. In the end though they are still just a conman. Please point me to the specific part of that poster's remarks where he/she confirms that one can be down thousands of percentile on a

[bagcheese]

Do I even have to defend your last statement? You got waxed and are all ego sore ..accept it...... accept it. Here, rather than reply to ridiculous posts from you I'm just going to keep posting this: This exchange over percentile. The person saying a larger drop in price to be accurately measured, yes you have to use digits past the decimal. It seems there’s agreement on that. It’s also true

[divot111]

Please point me to the part of that essay where it says one can be down thousands of percentile on a stock. Thanks in advance. I can't locate it.

[Canucope]

ummm shorting a stock you defintely can be... 

[divot111]

I agree you can lose more than you gamble when shorting a stock. That is not the context of the debate though. Apparently one can be down thousands of percentile when your stock purchase drops. I know, that scenario isn't real but that is the debate.

[bagcheese]

ThousandTHs of a percentile you complete wagon, and still waiting on that big math equation that you and your goblin NTB apparently drafted up ...oh that's right, you wagons didn't provide any math.. how's your ego to day bud? still swollen?? I bet And, regarding skin in the game; for the 21st time I ask, why are you posting on a board that you own no shares in?? This is pretty

[divot111]

What math equation did me and NTB apparently draft up? Is that all you do is make up lies to deflect from your original lie of one can be down thousandths of percentile on a stock purchase. Every day you get more and more dishonest you dolt. I will continue to ask. You will continue to deflect and make up lies but PLEASE direct me to the part of that info where it says one can be down thousandths

[bagcheese]

Yesterday at 6:14PM you (divot111) stated, an I quote: “The math I posted was and is correct” Ok so where is this math you goblin? I’ve asked you for this so called math 15 times, lets see it goblin, where is it? I gave math in all of those posts and as that member noted I gave you the math many ways to try to explain it to you and they made mention that you were confused and just didn’t

[divot111]

Round and round we go numbnuts. The math I posted that is correct was the actual real math that showed the percentage loss when you buy a stock at 120 and it goes to .01. Less than 100% and always will be in the REAL world. Or whatever example you used to try and validate your made up scenario of being down thousands of percentile on a stock purchase. A scenario that can not nor ever will exist

[bagcheese]

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Divot doesn't own NSP, #1 poster on NSP board Your replies are getting weaker, repetitive with no examples of anyting you're pushing you're still asserting I'm a conman yet you are the #1 poster on the bullboard of a company you own no shares in...................................the complete definition of

[divot111]

You know you are lying but every conman lies repeatedly. Can't be a conman if you don't act like a conman. I have never come across a bigger liar in my entire life. You know I put the math out there as you have refuted it as wrong repeatedly. I have never agreed with your made up math either but you lie about me agreeing with you too. You are a small dishonest dolt of a human being

[LongTheShorts]

Bag cheese, you should make up your own replies rather than cutting and pasting mine. Flattered you seem to agree with my statement but you seem able enough that you don’t really need to keep pasting it to every post lol. And how do you know Divot doesn’t have any shares? Maybe he’s shorting NSP, either way Divot has a right to post like anyone else. If you disagree with Divot, that’s fine he

[divot111]

You can put as many decimal points you want to in the equation but it still can't result in more than 100% loss. The percentile argument does not apply to what he is claming that one can be down thousandths of percentile on a stock purchase. Just because one says it doesnt make it true. Numbers don't lie people do and bagcheese does nothing but lie time after time in his posts and you know

[divot111]

Stock decline and increase are measured in percentages not percentile. Show me where it says otherwise. The one's who disagree have had weeks to do so but won't do it. Why? Because they can't. Conflating percentage with percentile does not validate an argument where percentile does not apply. Use your percentile math in a scenario where it applies. That's all

[divot111]

Percentile can be used to compare a stock to other stocks in a sector as a whole statistical wise but it does not apply to individul shareprice decline. That is measured in percentages. PLEASE show me the actual data that says otherwise. And I don't mean your math that doesn't apply to the argument. I mean a link that proves what you are saying or disproves what I am saying. I can not find

[LongTheShorts]

Fair argument, but that would be the same as essentially requesting someone to provide you evidence on share drop or decline being expressed fractionally.. although you can express  this spread fractionally, I'd highly doubt it's common or that anyone commonly expresses it in this fashion compared to percent. There are many uncommon yet correct words or ideas stated that aren't

[LongTheShorts]

I don't think your satements are wrong, but from what I can gather bag cheese wasn't saying you can lose more than 100%. I truly do believe you believe he was, but I've read everything and bag cheese wasn't saying you can lose more than 100%. However, that is for you to debate and either way I wish you the best. P.S. just for the record you can draw statistics and

[divot111]

I have never said or believed that bagcheese was saying one can lose more than 100%. That is just one of the many lies he has used to deflect from the original claim of being down thousands of percentile on a stock. That scenario doen't exist as stock decline is measured in percentages not percentile. Why is that so hard to admit? It is 100% true. Not 100 percentile true

[divot111]

Good news bagcheese! I just recieved a call from the Loch Ness Monster. He has asked me to invite you to join our Zoom call regarding actual grade 3 math and ethical behavior. He just can't stand seeing you continue down the road of willful dishonesty. He hopes he can maybe get you to feel better about yourself so you don't have continue trolling and making up lies to fill the void in your

[bagcheese]

Again .. no substance, no math and no intrelligence.. Do you feel that last post was ...clever? Wow... Feel free to post what math you speak of ..still waiting   Feel free to answer why, for the 20th time I  ask, are you the number one poster on a wall of a stock you have now ownership of??

[divot111]

I am not clear on your response numbnuts. Are you joining the ZOOM call or not? Old Lochhy want to know. I call him Lochhy. He likes that. He's a fun monster.