Naturally Splendid Enterprises Ltd V.NSP.H

Donkey111 give it up already, nobody cares about your ego

[bagcheese]

I can’t believe this is still being debated. How about this Divot, private message me instead of filling the NSP bullboard up in an attempt to patch up your ego. You’ll never admit publicly you got eviscerated in this debate.
 
All the points and equations I posted were correct. You lost. You didn’t understand the argument and when you finally realized it, you scrambled to save face. You’re all over the map trying to piece together some win that’s not coming. Pathetic.
 
Sounds like you learned a new word and can’t get enough of it from your posts; ‘obfuscation’ you say? You’ve jumped around every topic you’ve had put to you looking for some little win that’s not there. LTS is right on every single point made. Your posts are the epitome of someone trying to safe some face through obfuscation. Now you’re going at someone that showed you you’re wrong hahahaha man chill out. What are you waiting for? More examples of how you’re a joke. Dude you literally are the number one poster on the wall of a company you don’t own and all weekend by the looks too. Can ‘Loser’ be defined any better than that!?
 
Looks like all you did with your weekend was post on this wall all weekend hahahahahahaha trying to save your digital ego hahahahahaha omfg it would be hilarious if it wasn’t true. Look at the lengths you are going to - to save some kind of respect on a bullboard of a stock you have no ownership it. Amazingly pathetic. At least you’ve been tied up trying to salvage some face too much to bash a stock you don’t own.
 
Here’s a hint maybe you can understand: Don’t try to save any respect on this board. People view you as someone that owns no NSP shares but are so disgruntled by losses from an untimely NSP investment that you can’t bare to see anyone else make money off NSP. In other words, yet another example of not being able to let go of losses. Much the same as the loss you suffered on this issue. Let go duster. Don’t waste your life trying to prove to the NSP bullboard that the great divot111 knows all hahahahahahaha
 
How about this you sea gull, post something about NSP. I can’t believe you’re still trying to save some face here. Are you that bewildered and destroyed you must show the NSP board (that you don’t own shares in) you need respect on this issue? Like I said last week, your posts are like watching a sick animal die.

[divot111]

Were you looking in a mirror while posting your novel? The original claim by you has been debunked. You changed the narrative. Just like a hukster/conman would do. I will continue waiting for the math that verifies your original false claim. Not the math that has nothing to do with it.

[LongTheShorts]

You’re so hurting, you lost, move on. You “debunked” nothing. Nobody cares, and I have no idea what you’re talking about as you never offered any math at all of your own upon multiple requests. This persona that you’re “waiting on math” is cute as we are all waiting on yours. Nobody supports your convoluted ever shifting ‘arguments’. If I changed the “narrative”, why now are you asking for “math

[divot111]

Whoopsie! Hahahaha! I knew you would slip up at some point and reply under the wrong alias. Nice job conman/conmen or whatever you choose to be. Now put the numbers from you guys example of buying a stock at 120 and having it drop to 1 and show how it equates to a 12000 percentile loss in shareprice. That's right. It makes zero sense in reality which is why you won't do the math but I will

[LongTheShorts]

That's your answer? Exposed what exactly?  I asked you to bring up math that is yours that shows how bagcheeses was in anyway wrong.. where is your math that proves the math wrong? And how does that math you just displayed in any fashion show how your argument is correct? How does that display your argument correct? I asked last week for math that dispays your argument correct? Where is

[divot111]

Give it up already you f'kn moron. You messed up and showed that you post under 2 aliases just like myself and DKM suspected. You have not denied it once. Now are you going to prove your example of buying a stock at 120 dollars and having it drop to 1 dollar is a 12000 percentile decline? Of course you won't. You will just play obsfucator over and over again and this will continue into

[LongTheShorts]

Hahahahahahaha wow you are really trying to save your ego, you wish this was aliases and you still haven't displayed any math that proves bagcheeses argument false. This new excuses to keep from messaging privately? You just cant have your ego smashed and need to find fire to keep this going. That 'math' you displayed doesn't prove your agrument correct nor bag cheeses wrong. You

[divot111]

You do realize you are using the same language as bagcheese now after trying to play nice under your other alias LongTheShorts this whole time right? You do realize you posted under bagcheese, I replied, then you replied as if you were bagcheese but from your other alias LongTheShorts right? Your original claim has been dubunked by two other posters as well as myself as using the term percentile

[LongTheShorts]

Same language? it's right in the title if you're refering to 'ego' and your sore digital ego I was messaging you under this thread, you jumped to a conclusion again. That is a good line though, digital ego. It's hilarious when you get onto something and are so excited just to realize you jumped to another conclusion. Slipping though your finger like this math. This math you

[divot111]

Still can't see the math I am asking to be clarified that I keep giving you and you keep asking for? Hahahahahaahahah! You just got busted posting under the wrong alias and now you are talking around that point too. I am betting that you didn't think you were that dumb. I knew it all along dumbo. Now keep pretending you didn't get caught even though you replied to my post to bagcheese

[LongTheShorts]

im lost on your alias talk and cant see the link you are drawing, I read the post and replied to it assuming you had directed it at me..that doesn't equate to me having two identities ..you're losing it man or is this just an attempt to keep this going? ..and this issue of math, youve produced nothing to show bagcheese argument wrong. Read that carefully; you've provided no math, to

[divot111]

Lol. Round and round with a conman. I proved your incorrect use of the term percentile with actual math at the beginning of this debate. You know that but you are a conman who continues to pretend otherwise. Just like you now can't see the link regarding you being dumb enough to post under the wrong name using the exact same rhetoric as the other name you post under. I look forward to your

[divot111]

Here is my reply to bagcheeses first post under the title Donkey111 that is clearly aimed at bagcheese being the rhetoric used. There is no way you nor anyone else would beleive it was directed at them. But of course you say you assumed it was aimed at you after f*kng up and using the wrong alias to reply. Nice try though you dishonest dolt. "Were you looking in a mirror while posting your

[LongTheShorts]

Thats evidence of an alias? hahaha you're really reaching Ben Matlock. I did assume it was to me and no I didnt make up the term digital ego, it was in bagcheeses posts but it fits you so so good, you are more desparate than ever talking about aliases hahahahahaha I love it hahaha and your use of the word huckster or whatever it is you're so proud of that word  and again, how does

[divot111]

Good Grief, why are 'you' still trying to get me to debate something that has nothing to do with the original claim 'you' made. I even gave 'you' the example 'you' posted to verify your false claim. 'You' have the numbers and the first three posts that proved 'you' made a mistake. I will continue to wait for your math equation, using your example

[LongTheShorts]

Give it up already. People don't care. But love the conspiracy theories And I didn't get a private message so I guess you're still in repair mode of your digital ego. Even if bagcheese and I were working together or as you say the same person lol 'you' lol still haven't shown anything to either prove his argument wrong or further show your argument correct. Nothing. At

[divot111]

Nope? You care and are wrong. Always will be. Ok, now 'you' go

[divot111]

Even the conman slips up at some point. So hilarious! You play nice under LongTheShorts and belittle and attack under bagcheese. You have just outed yourself you dishonest dolt. Good job numbnuts. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah. What a moron! You need to keep better track of your obsfucation and remember to reply under the correct alias or your con game gets exposed. OMG you