Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum NYX GAMING GROUP LTD 11 PCT DEBS V.NYX.DB

TSXV:NYX.DB - Post Discussion

View:
Post by STOCKMAN70 on May 07, 2017 9:43pm

NYX

My take is that management needs to renegotiate lower interest rates, restructure the debt and continue to increase revenues at double digit growth to recognize the potential if they are only able to  realize 30% EBITDA. My preference would be to reduce debt (improving the chances of better borrowing terms)  before spending millions on moving to the TSX. 

Also, I think management would have come off as having more integrity and competence if they would have owned up to the impairments on the conference call - why not just admit you overpaid, management has learned from the mistake and are taking steps to ensure it won't happen again going forward?  They would have earned my respect more than blaming IFRS rules. 

For NYX success comes down to debt maintenance and cash flow in my opinion. To base the performance solely on EBITDA gives management too much credit in my opinion - If someone loaned me $330m I could buy a bunch of assets (and overpay) and achieve a great EBITDA as well but that wouldn't mean the company is going to thrive or even survive in the long term if you can't make the debt maintenance payments. 

I recently took a small position as there is very good potential but It is in the hands of a CEO that based on past performance has not made the best decisions in my opinion. 

Not wanting to sound overly negative and if they can ever get 35-40% EBITDA Shareholders will be rewarded!  

Glta
Comment by STOCKMAN70 on May 07, 2017 9:48pm
Apologies, should have read margins instead of EBITDA on previous post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities